The fact that you people think a selfish bastard like Seungho would bother carrying bride style someone other than Na-Kyum is sending me.
Even funnier are all the theories about Seungho having sex every day with someone who's not Na-Kyum. As if season 1 didn't state that he's obsessed with him and hasn't had sex with his hoes in a long time.
I'm also speechless at how some of you think the person he's kissing is a woman because they have breast apparently? This is the author's drawing style. A quick look at the previous sex scenes would confirm that. Na-Kyum and even Seungho sometimes both have small "boobs".
Critical thinking really has left the chat
exactly they sound dumbb. plus wouldnt that be too much to cover in one season? i mean we already got jihwas love problems, the assassins whole deal, potential side couple between the assassin and jihwa, min's whole deal with seungho n nakyum, seunghos past, and development between nakyum n seungho as a couple n individually. who tf is this random bitch to be coming in out of nowhere wit all this going on?
She's a rapist and she needs to go to jail. Seriously. The mc's boyfriend was raped as a child, why is no one in the story acknowledging that? He was sexually abused at a young age and as a victim, he was never able to sever ties with his aggressor. It's sad that he was manipulated to believe that he consented to the relationship at some point, just because he didn't stop her.
http://www.mangago.zone/read-manga/itonaga_kun_no_koi_no_ito/uu/nhs_v-2-chapter-599941/pg-13/
what the hell, that looks just like Sanada in a wig









Why did the merchant not spill the tea about Na-Kyum and Seungho throwing him out of his own shop to fuck?
Is he perhaps scared of Seungho's wrath? I don't think he'd care if people knew he was going out with one man only, it's actually more honorable than the harem he had a few months ago.
Maybe he cared for seungho deeply, since he is his servant he must be the one who works there for so long and might also know his past.
I'm talking about the servant in the beginning, not the servant.
Sorry, the MERCHANT in the beginning
Ohhh okay, sorry for misunderstanding your comment (▰˘◡˘▰)