Consent under the influence is never a yes. Both times the Uke was intoxicated enough to be stumbling and barely able to walk whilst the seme was in perfect confront, there was no consent either times.it’s still rape. He said yes while barely being able to walk. That’s not consent.
Then don't bother reading, when you're just going to overanalyze everything.
I’m just saying, I’m not saying they csnt read or enjoy the story anyway but I’m just telling them it was in fact rape. Not over analyzing just educating
It was clearly overanalyzing. He went to the bar to find other men and obviously he drank, so he's drunk. What's the difference when he's drunk and wished to be embraced by other men and be drunk and be embraced by the ML? He achieve half of his goal, SEX. He's drunk, but he remembers he clearly that he gave his consent. So where's rape there?
Whys everyone saying there was no consent the second time? They both drank even though I agree that bottom guy was more drunk. He was sober enough to say yes