
Oksy. My friends did the research.
I can give it to you but you will have to read it. it is up to you to learn something or look uneducated to the ones who know the term you are carelessly throwing around.
As we know, Stockholm Syndrome is a coping mechanism to a captive or abusive situation. People develop positive feelings toward their captors or abusers over time. This condition applies to situations including child abuse, coach-athlete abuse, relationship abuse and sex trafficking
This isn’t the right type of relationship abuse and if you look at psychological causes, signs and symptoms this story doesn’t fit.
https://www.choosingtherapy.com/stockholm-syndrome/#:~:text=Some%20of%20the%20more%20common,documented%20in%20the%20research%20include%3A&text=Feeling%20closely%20bonded%20or%20attached,of%20the%20captor%20or%20abuser
It gives you 5 Examples of Stockholm Syndrome. None are close. 4 is the Stockholm syndrome abusive relationship. The abuse that causes Stockholm Syndrome isn’t there and there many elements that don’t allow to development Stockholm syndrome.
The original Beauty and the Beast is Stockholm Syndrome but the Disney’s version isn’t. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1460&context=criterion#:~:text=The%20original%20Beauty%20of%20Beauty,syndrome%20have%20all%20but%20vanished.
It can’t and won’t be Stockholm Syndrome. It is not Dan catching feelings from an abusive situation either. The story says something else. It isn’t trauma bonding either.

Ad hominem: in other words, a personal attack, attacking the person instead of attacking the issue. an example of Ad hominem would be, "poisoning the well" which is the direct attack on the trustworthiness of the person making a statement instead of addressing the statement.
Ad hominem refers to attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself."
They must not have a very good argument with the imposing and ad hominems.
Thank you for sharing you know you are wrong and lost.
if you are resorted to insults you know you lost.
I am being factual. Read Chapter One again and educate yourself on Stocklom Syndrome.
Tell me how your patheic ad hominem relates?
"your delusional not catching feelings from a abusive situation if you don't think this shit is abusive as hell you should seek help like wtaf"
I am posting facts? Facts are not delusional. Not catching feeling for an abusive situation"
Did the facts go over your head? Try again.
"if you don't think this shit is abusive as hell " Where do I apply that? Saying it is not SS does not say this was abusive. How illogical. What is abusive as hell? What is hell like?
This is from the shallow end of the pool. Meaning there are more toxic studies than this one.
You should take your own advice. You imposed arguments to feel better about yourself. 'Oh look at me I have more morals and am more self-righteous than MD.'
When in fact you are showing you have no morals by trying to harm a real person. You are more toxic than this story. The story is fake. I am real.
It does seem like you are talking about yourself because you have gaslighted yourself.

This made me laugh I'm not reading allat why you getting so serious in a manga comment section get a life also you literally said he not catching feeling from being in abusive relationship in your words not mine but he is in fact in an extremely abusive situation and catching n feelings cause he's got no one your backtracking it's pathetic lol also thinking your words are fact's embarrassing this may be the most pathetic reply I've seen lol
Never noticed Kim Dan was crying in the cover