I'm honestly just glad he found out eventually. I read this years ago, and it was at the p...

it is rape and abuse my girllllllll

It's a fictional story yet here we are

it was created by a human who’s having weird thoughts and who created a child porn manga yet here we are

So why are you reading them lol ╮(￣▽￣)╭

reading it bc u thought it would be a great manga and enjoying rape isn’t the same (⌒▽⌒)

But you clearly know what kind of author this is lol hmmmmヾ(❀╹◡╹)ﾉ~

so >_<? i read it bc now i have more proof that this author is disgusting and ur a piece of shit since you love child porn and rape so much ٩(๑❛ᴗ❛๑)۶

More proof lmao you needed more proof than the child story? Yikes you're not too bright I can't argue w idiots I'll be off ヾ(❀╹◡╹)ﾉ~

There is a difference between glorified abuse in fiction and depicted abuse in fiction! If you don't have sufficient media literacy just say so ! x

There is a difference however, if someone is unable to distinguish between the two, that’s more on the author than the regular because the author didn’t make it clear when talking about serious situations like this, it has to be pretty clear because real people who blame victims to this day. I’m not saying break this down to a second grader I’m just saying make it clear.

As I do completely understand what you mean, my statement can still lie true on the fact we need to comprehend subtext more. Although, what you do mean is right

i can’t agree with this. like killing stalking was pretty clearly a depiction of how much abuse messes people up and readers still misinterpreted it. If readers can’t distinguish reality from fiction and glorification from depiction then they shouldn’t be reading stories like these.

I think the main difference between something like this and killing stalking is killing stalking was just a horror book with homosexuality. And they both met bad ending. Like nothing good ever happened for the two awful main characters especially their relationship. This one is different because the main perpetrator gets a slap on the rest and then it ends like you would see a comedy and in which case he finds him again and they have a will they won’t like he didn’t just almost ruin his life so while I agree, people who can’t distinguish reality from fiction shouldn’t be reading this. I also think writers who can’t properly write a distinction between glorification and depiction shouldn’t be writing it.

Killing stalking was an excellent example because that’s the type of writer who should be writing it.

i see where you’re coming from that’s a good distinction. Harada definitely writes stories for the sake of having messed up stories while KS was more written to write a message. I think it becomes clear after the first few chapters the type of story harada is writing and it falls on the readers to continue or stop. so while Koogi and Harada are writing distinct stories I still think it’s crucial for readers to distinguish the two bc authors like harada won’t simply stop writing nor should they. given all harada’s stories i’m sure we all know their intent; it’s no accident that their stories read as they do i don’t think it’s Harada being unable to distinguish the two in their writing.

I’m not trying to say someone should be kicked out of the writing space I’m just trying to say that a lot of people in situations and fully blame the reader but like most things, It’s a little bit of a a little bit of b like the fault should be on both the reader and the writer. None of them fully takes the blame, and I don’t like seeing when someone fully blames the one and not the other. One of the way someone can educate themselves on whether or not they even like this is by trying, and if they don’t like it, then that person is free to leave a bad comment on it and keep it pushing because it’s not gonna stop the writer. It’s ok for people not to like things