Sorry i meant to like and clicked wrong
It's ephebophilia not pedo since he's in HS. Also the author didn't say whether the kid was in his last year of HS, if he was, he'd likely be 18, which is legal adult age in Japan (age of consent is 16 there and also 16 in many places in the US, btw).
If the law says lower, you guys will go even lower, if the law set the young adult age to 14, you would say that it's okay to rail a 14 years old child.
Gurl, good moral, proper mindset, and human decency is more reliable than your "Japanese Government" that country literally has lolicon and shotacon as a cover up word for pedophilia
Also don't try to smart words me with deadass bull crap of an obvious google searched information you've spouted.
My definition of a pedophila literally came from Dsm5 in which case, most men with pedophilic interests report that their attractions began during adolescence, often around age 12 to 16.
Unlike general sexual orientation (which stabilizes in late adolescence), pedophilic interest often emerges before or during puberty and tends to be persistent rather than acquired later in adulthood.
So next time, try to search mental illness from the actual book, not mister google
I had encountered a Pedophilic person in psych ward during my "on job training" as a nursing student, they almost act like a normal person but when they spotted children, they are vile
"I'm just saying you were wrong, "Gurl", just use your brain. Calling this pedo is wrong. it's not pedophilia based on DEFINITION - get a dictionary, read a book, don't be dumb.
I am also pointing out the age of adulthood and consent because (pretty much everywhere in the world) the number is arbitrary but based on your examples, I'm sure you're not smart enough to know this. Psychologically, humans are not fully "adults" until 25 so what's with these adult age numbers (US 18 for example). Additionally, humans are actually sexually mature at puberty and since you're tiny brain doesn't know this - that's 11-15 years old, and the reason being is because biologically, we want to produce children while it's more likely the mother survives (that's why 35+ is geriatric age- I hope you know what geriatric means). Culturally we made 18 the threshold of it being okay but biologically and psychologically, we're off. If we went by morality - the cut off should be 25.
No where am I saying this is right, and I'm not Japanese, dumbass. Didn't your teacher teach you not to assume? And I don't give a crap if you encountered a pedophilic person, that's your baggage, you don't even know if I have or have not. You're a stranger, if I did, I wouldn't tell you.
The main point is that I'm just calling you stupid, STUPID.
And stop spamming, write clearer, and again, learn your words.
I know it may feel like you’re right to you since you're thinking logically here. But please reread everything you're saying and consider which side you sound like you're taking. What you’re saying sounds gross, as if you believe it is morally correct for this relationship to happen.
If that truly is the case, please seek help. I wish you the best in getting better.
Reread my comment. When did I say anything about morality? Or whether anything is right or wrong? I'm just pointing out what someone say wrong. Those are the literal definitions of those particular "-philis". And they are distinguished in psychology for important reasons (Look it up since I'm tired of you people just throwing around terms). And I simply states what the age of consents are in those locations (look it up instead of arguing semantics). Also if you were educated in philosophy or religion, you'd know that "morality" (the principles regarding the distinction of right and wrong) is product of times. For example, women were expected to marry young back in the day to increase the chances of surviving childbirth. Would you say that is "wrong" if the women getting married then having children after 25 would significantly increase their chances of dying? So don't just throw around that word, thinking that it makes you in the "right". And before you go off again, the Bible itself looks considered girls "women" ready to marry and bear children when puberty starts (which for some starts at 12!).
Again, I did not say anything about anything being right/wrong (my own opinions were not present in the original post). You really need to learn to read. I am saying that is the wrong term and I am saying that it might be legal age of consent. And like I pointed out, before western society goes up on their high horse, the age of consent is also similar in many states and western countries, which means your "morality wrong" sentiment might be more prevalent around the world and affecting western states just as much as Japan.
Just take the facts and think a little bit for yourself instead of just spewing things you think you know and making yourself look ill-educated.
Look, what I’m trying to say is that you seem like a pedophile. So I suggest you think before you crash out online and reword what you say, or others may take it the wrong way.
Also, I am not religious. I do not care if the bible considers girls ready to bear children at such a young age. I also do not give a shit if the age of consent allows children to be with adults. I care about a children’s safety from people like you. I no longer believe you are against pedophiles, but instead the type of people I need to keep my children away from.
So please, respectfully, stay away from children.
Pedo pedo pedowwphiliyaaaaaa