Trash

how is the sister the only victim she literally knew everything from the beginning and just decided to ignore everything and proceed to be homophobic about them she literally walked into this willingly and turned a blind eye and then acted surprised when she saw from her own eyes, like he already told you you’re just in denial

The sister is NOT THE VICTIM NOBODY TOLD HER TO TRY TO CHANGE A GAY MAN
ESPECIALLY WHEN THAT MAN TILD IN WHICH TOLD U HE LIKES YOUR BROTHER FROM THE VERY JUMP
HE EVEN SHOWED HER BY SUCKING HIS DICK WHILST HE WAS ASLEEP BUT SHAWTY WANTED TO IGNORE AND BE DELUSIONAL

Told*

She didn't choose to be homophobic I think it has nothing to do with sexuality. She knew he fell in love with her brother but her brother is declining him so she offered dating/marriage wtv and mf accepted her. Not her trying to change him rather "if he knew me he'd love me" the type of normal thing.
Honestly if it wasn't her brother but her sister ya'll wouldn't have thought the same way u doing rn. Or if he was bi not gay u would have thought that she was wronged cuz in what scenario would it be someone's fault for having a crush on someone who is saying "oh I love this person but they keep turning me down" and then betraying them after getting married with their old crush

I See your point of her beeing a victim in this, thinking he would love her eventually. But this doesnt give her the right to blame the brother and load all her shit on him. Imo she lost it the moment she saw her bf/husband SAing her brother! It didnt work for her, so she should have stepped back and cut lines with bf (and why did she proposed so early?! dont use marriage to bind someone who clearly doesnt love you (yet)) and damn, reflects her own behavior and feelings!
her beeing homophobic? I dont know, but i also dont care, bc the way she acts makes me damn angry, and her Feelings may be a reason but no excuse.
My conclusion: everyone (the least the bro in law) is a victim here, they do shit, hurting each other and the reason is the bro in law beeing manipulative af and all being insecure and salty. But its really interesting how the readers interprete it so differently, taking "a side" and writing their arguments. I dont like stories with so many red flags and toxic people, but with them beeing nearly on the same Level its damn interesting.

No, I would have said the same thing because she was just STUPID. She wasn’t just innocent thinking "oh maybe if he knew me he’d love me" she was in DENIAL, he said everything from the get-go and she ignored it. From the start she thought "two guys together ? How weird", she might just have thought two guys together means nothing and she could "change" him well no, now she’s shocked that the guy actually likes his brother and blames her brother for everything ( while he was getting SAed and she saw it ??? )
They’re all at fault and she’s not the only victim here.

So I kinda agree with ur way of thinking but..
Did she have the right to blame the brother? Yes,since he knew that she had feelings for him so even if her husband betrayed her why should he betray her too. When she said "it's ok if it's not mutual" or smh like that. That's where she thought she was still safe and could still try to make her husband fall for her ig.
Was she wrong for acting like she didn't know anything when her bf was making it clear as hell? Obv but even that doesn't make her someone to blame rather than that I'd blame her husband for pushing her buttons he could have just divorced her but nah he lit drove her crazy on purpose.
Just to clarify I'm taking no ones "side" ╥﹏╥ I really am just saying my opinion and arguing within that.

Yes when she saw her brother getting SAed that was the worst thing now u mention it.

Thx for claryfing with your last paragraph. I assumed you weighting the wrongs of the sis much less in comparison to the other two, because you called her a victim. And victim is a strong term no one in this story applies to imo.

"Did she have the right to blame the brother?" Here comes my confusion with the timeline tbh. If the MC slept willingly with ML, when they were still married, holy crap hes a damn asshole. But I read it like follow:
MC and ML came together as bfs or sex buddies -> fighting and ending it -> Sis met ML and start dating -> proposal and ML clearly telling sis about his feelings and the relationship he had with MC -> marriage -> SA to sleeping MC-> divorce -> MC meeting ML again in bar and sex -> ML sending photo to sis....
so in this timeline the MC didnt particiate in the cheating of ML (bc he was sleeping, what sis saw) and slept with him only after the divorce. Thats not a great move tbf but MC had feelings for ML too, making this situation so much more complicated. And they there together before sis appeared, what she knew since proposing. So why didnt sis thought about MCs feelings at all? ML didnt straight up deny them dating, but went silent. She could (and should) have assumed MC also had feelings and like confronting him and asking how he feels about her marrying his ex. With this context the answer isnt as clear anymore imo. He for example also have the right to blame her imo (at least if he knew she knew about the realationship) bc she completely ignored his feelings. and thats also the reason i don't blame the MC to this extent like she does. If i would be in her situation i would be as angry as her ofc, but that wouldnt excuse such a behavior towards her bro either. And if i were the MC i also would be confused, dissapointed and stressed. As the reader, knowing more details, i dont think she is a victim like you said in the initial post, or rather they are both victims of the ML. All of your arguments would work for me, IF she didnt knew of MCs and MLs former relationship. But like this, she is as much to blame as the MC. Thats what i wanted to stress out.
In the husbands case, I think we are on the same page that he is a manipulating asshole ^^