
When an author chooses to put rape in their story and make the victim fall in love with the abuser; It is showing that rape can be glossed over, "in the name of love", when it shouldn't be. Romanticize literally means to make something better than it seems. And the author is doing that by having a RAPE story turn into a relationship. The people in the comments are just pointing it out, not "throwing out" the words romanticize and glamorize. These words directly correlate with the themes presented in this story. It seems like you don't understand what romanticize means at all, but it's fine. You seem a bit young and don't understand what either words mean.

now who tf thinks rape and abuse is good when the two people involved in it "fall in love". the story doesn't romanticize neither glorify it, it just presents a situation where it takes place and it's the reader who understands and attachs their own meaning to the story. and when I was reading in no way in hell I saw it being romanticized, maybe it's just you thought that way. and mind you they haven't even fallen in love , how about letting the story go on for a while then judge?

people like you are actually insane who completely water down a story to "rape" like if someone asked you describe this story youre first and only word would be rape and thats how much of a reading comprehensive y'all have with dark stories. Like if things like rape and sa trigger you so much then you shouldn't even be reading this in the first place and telling people "how it's wrong to romanticize bla bla" when there are people here who want to understand and enjoy the complexity of this story.
half of yall read shit without checking tags then complain when you don't like is mentioned in the tags