
I didn’t call anything a waste and you missed my point entirely. By calling them a hypocrite, you’re saying that because they’re reading this illegally they don’t get to say they dislike what they view as non-consensual sex.
That’s the same kind of thinking that leads to the belief that sex-workers or substance abusers can’t be raped because they’re doing something illegal.

This isn’t personal, I’m not trying to go at you. You’re still missing my point.
You’re being too concerned about the fact that I may be telling you are thinking about something wrong to listen to my point.
Your idea that someone is a hypocrite for criticizing what they view as rape in the media they are consuming, because it’s stolen, is flawed.
That’s like saying I can’t have a problem with finding child porn in a magazine because I stole the magazine from the store.

I don't concern about people disliking this?
I have problems with people bad-mouthing new author, not knowing the nuance, calling it a waste instead trying to know why the author make it that way.
The nuance were because sex sell, this author trying to break the market, give them time to grow. You don't know how publishing works, yet you throw stone at everyone who dared to call out hypocrite?
You can have a problem with some content but if you stole the shit then be prepared with the consequences.

Your comment is very hypocritical, lmao, the irony. Why would you worry about people here "not giving them time to grow", when we're not even the target audience (AKA paying customers)? we're just leeches. What we say here doesn't have any effect on the author because we're not even supposed to be able to read this here anyways.
So let us trash have our own opinions on the works here without calling us out for a behavior you also are engaging into.

It's an unfortunate thing, but the two of you have found yourself in a spiral of ants sort of situation, because you're both kind of right, because you're both talking about a different thing.
One of you is talking about a waste of money/time, which would indeed be pretty hypocritical to comment about on a piracy site and one of you is talking about a waste of good art, which also makes sense, since the rushed non-con just to get to sex cheapens really good art. Alas, you're doomed to eternity of arguing, may you be at peace.

Lmao smh I don’t know what to say because if you’re addressing me in this comment you’ve also completely misunderstood my point and also missed the fact that I never even criticized this story let alone made a comment about the “art being a waste”.
I’m not responding in order to fight you. I’m saying this to be clear, because you’re misconstruing what I’m saying if you are indeed including me in your comment.

Yes, I'm not calling out the people who find this dub/non-con distasteful but rather the one who trashed the artist by calling it a waste.
That being said, it's a strategy or rather trying to survive in current art market that over saturated by making this kind of story, best believe if the artist given time and funds to make better, they will. I'm hoping this story blow up and the artist able to make a living or maybe more developed and well written story than this.

I mean I also do not want to fight you, but the original comment is literally only addressing people calling it waste. That's why this situation is circling around that. Both the fact that calling it waste is hypocritical and the fact that people will dislike it because of the SA can be true at the same time, so I think perhaps you misconstrued the original comment which is only addressing the "waste" factor. If you never even made a comment about it being a waste and don't want to discuss whether it's fine to call it a waste, why even reply to the og comment and. oh my fucking god I'm in the spiral of ants get me out of here fuck fuck fuck
Waste? Y'all pirating shit weirdo lmao
Talk about hypocrite