
You are soo fucking triggered just because you lost an argument to the point that now you are directly calling me out here making a new comment thread my god people can be so lifeless.. you completely ignored what i said and went on continuously defending rape ... Trying to mislead people here and bitch about me won't make your life any easier... I feel sorry for your pathetic arse because i can clearly see your pathetic ego got hurt for all the wrong reasons..

Just to let you know its the law and i didn't make the rules lol . Women can't commit rape .. if they assault someone thats called sexual assault.. if you don't believe me you have the free access to Internet just search and you will find out instead of reading this crack head's comment... This person is trying to get validation from you people by bashing me here... Can't believe people can stoop this low... Just because they couldn't win an argument she is trying to distort what i said...

You are trying to justify a rape here that woowon committed with a consensual sex they had in 59-61 chapters.... I at least wrote it so many times but you completely ignored what i said after the words "forceful" and "rage induced" ... And coming here to bitch about it to feel good about yourself, twisting my words and lying here in such a pathetic way shows how rotten you are tbh...
When both of the events are completely different. The previous sex where seoan was angry and forced himself on woowon, but then WOOWON MANHANDLED HIM AND CALMED HIM DOWN THEN THEY HAD CONSENSUAL SEX , Im gonna cap this because you keep ignoring the rest of the sentence and twisting it as you wish..
And i never said bottoms are not capable of committing rape , why do you keep lying here in the comment section? You are lucky that this app doesn't allow screenshots.. as long as they have dick anyone is capable of committing rape...but here what seoan did wasn't a rape but what woowon did is a rape thats the biggest issue and no amount of your bitching and denial can justify that act...

And just to let you know, you are more pathetic and childish than I presumed.. making a complete different thread just to bitch about me is the wild thing here.. the way you keep on lying and distorting what i said is outrageous and then resorting to personal attacks is something only a degenerate would do...
You don't have enough knowledge regarding these topics, you just read these stories and keep pretending that one wrong against another wrong is justified.. you won't last long with that kind of mindset in the real world ..

since i’m done with my exams, let me go ahead and give my full undivided attention to arguing with a self-proclaimed “law student” who somehow still can’t comprehend simple-ass words. like damn, i’ve been spelling things out in the most basic terms and you still manage to miss the point. embarrassing.
you really out here saying i’m “justifying rape”? where? quote it. point it out. show the receipts. oh wait — you can’t, because you're out here hallucinating arguments that were never made. and what’s worse is that you said you’ve been “re-reading the thread” like some obsessed fan, and still can’t understand what’s being said? yeah… that’s not a me problem. that’s 100% a YOU problem. LOL
the fact that you keep caps-locking “CONSENSUAL SEX” like that magically erases the context of how it started says a lot about your logic skills. and now you’re crying about me “bitching in a thread”? please. you’ve been unhinged in multiple replies, throwing around insults, slurs, and outdated law takes, and now you’re playing victim because someone dared to hold you accountable in public?
nah. you don’t get to fumble this hard, lie about what was said, twist everything out of context, and then act shocked when people call you out. maybe take a break from pretending you’re a legal expert and go re-learn how to read instead. because clearly, comprehension isn't your strong suit. your client would go to jail with that comprehension of yours, babe

omg can't believe i managed to make a freaking prick this triggered... I can clearly see your ass burning just because none of your supposed self cooked logics actually makes sense.. and you keep inventing new lies that i never said.. this is not called holding accountable my girl this is called being miserable and embarrassing.. your back is burning just because you couldn't come up with a single valid point... You actually can't read English and need education... Because no way in hell anyone could interpret what i said that wrong.. you just need to vent your anger cuz your ego got bruised.. and i never told you what i do for a living i was talking to someone else in the thread, but you keep reading my replies like a "obsessed fan" as per your saying and kept making personal attacks.. when a person can't argue back the only thing they got going is resorting to personal attacks .. im not playing victim its you who opened up a new thread playing victim to feel good about yourself.. you need validation that bad to the point you had to resort to this... Im actually laughing at how lowlives react online

lmfao not you saying “i made you triggered” when you're the one who’s been writing essays packed with slurs, made-up laws, and ego tantrums. if anyone’s burning, it’s clearly the one who can’t go a single reply without spiraling and throwing insults every two sentences. you said i have no valid point? babe, you just don’t have the reading skills to keep up with one. also, saying i’m “obsessed” for responding to your public meltdown? your replies have been loud and wrong, and i simply gave you the energy you’ve been begging for.
you don't get to talk nonsense in public and then cry when people hold it up to the light. lol

It’s ironic how someone who claims others “can’t read English and need education” is the one contradicting themselves repeatedly and failing to construct a coherent argument without resorting to all caps, name-calling, and personal attacks. That’s not a sign of someone making a point, it’s a textbook example of someone who’s triggered. You claimed rape can't be committed by women because “that’s the law,” then in the same rant said “anyone with a dick can commit rape” which directly contradicts your previous point. That alone shows a lack of comprehension, not from others, but from you. Your own words prove that you're the one grasping for control of the narrative by repeating the same lines, calling people "lifeless," "degenerate," and accusing them of "bitching" all because your argument didn’t land. That isn't confidence. It's projection. If you genuinely believe that education and reading comprehension are lacking here, you might want to re-read your own comments because that’s exactly where the problem lies. Oh right! You’ve already done that and still can’t grasp the situation you’ve created. At this point, it’s really a you problem. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

You claimed rape can't be committed by women because “that’s the law,” then in the same rant said “anyone with a dick can commit rape” which directly contradicts your previous point. - How is this contradicting care to explain?? Does women have dick ?? Lol the way you are coming at me makes me think that im talking to the same person..
My arguments landed hard and well i know that very clearly.. its ironic that the people who ain't got any knowledge about these stuff keep talking like they invented it... I made not one multiple points regarding this issue and im not the one crying over it in a hate thread... So your weak clapping is not working either... I don't need to reread my own comment but you guys do because you keep distorting every little thing and keep changing what you stand for... Im confident enough to talk about it openly with logics but you guys need backups and resort to personal attacks to get it going... Its clear who needs proper comprehensive skills because someone who changes their statement every few minutes and then lies like they never said it is very concerning... At this point its clear who is the problem.

You asked how your statements contradict, so let me explain in simple terms. You first said that “women can’t commit rape, that’s the law,” and then later said, “as long as they have a dick, anyone can commit rape.” These two points don’t go together. The first is based on your interpretation of legal definitions, while the second shifts the focus to anatomy. So which is it? Is rape defined strictly by law, or by whether someone has a penis? Jumping between legal definitions and biology without realizing the contradiction shows a clear lack of consistency in your argument. On top of that, saying “that’s the law” as if it applies everywhere is factually incorrect. Different countries define rape differently. It depends on the jurisdiction, which makes your argument both misleading and oversimplified. As for the “bottoms can’t rape” point, while you may not have said it outright, you clearly implied it by saying only people “with a dick or uses a dick” can commit rape. That excludes the idea of a bottom or a woman being a rapist, even when the situation involves force, coercion, or lack of consent. That’s why people are reacting strongly because you’re dismissing abuse just because it doesn’t fit your limited definition. No one is twisting your words here. What’s happening is that you didn’t fully understand the implications of your own argument. That’s not on the readers that’s on you.
calling yourself a 'law student' while saying 'sudden,' 'forceful,' and 'not an assault' all in the same sentence is actual peak brainrot. like be serious. it’s insane how some people still can’t accept that bottoms can be rapists and abusers too. just because you like the art style doesn’t mean you gotta excuse everything the character does.
people are always quick to drag the top when he does something wrong (which, yes, he did in the recent chapter), but the moment the bottom crosses a line? radio silence. the same 'law student' out here calling out woowon now, but wouldn’t even consider what seoan did way back as assault? that’s wild. that’s ironic.
if that’s how someone studying law thinks, then yeah… the world’s cooked. lmao. smh