Downvotes to transpohia comments? Of course..I think it's just that to most people it seem radical to see a problem where there is none and drop a series for that when sorry to whoever it may offend but there was no transphobia here. It was literally like 5 panels and the setting of a lustfull harassing character who was way too forward with his advances regardless if the was trans, hetero or another gay. The punch by a gangster?! First he is a GANGSTER so punch would have been delivered even if it was a gay man or hetero woman. He fucking rejected the advanced at some point so he was being harassed.
To some point the ladyboy appearance even has logic about the chapter context where the gangster is tolerating the advances mostly thinking it's a woman which he is used to but recoils when he finds there is d*ck involved even though he has no problem with the main character having d*ck.
So yeah in a orgy party full mostly of horny people belonging to that sex party scene there are bound to be "lustfull" disrespectfull people regardless of what they are...even trans ones...So my question is... it should have been a gay man or a hetero woman being forwardly harassing for it to not be phobia? Seems hypocritical much. Maybe forward is not the word but a harassing lustfull dcharacter? Again doesn't matter it could be anyone that the main point of equality, being trans, hetero, gay or whatever does not makes you unable of harassing someone.
So now it needs to be a character with a specific genre or sexual orientation being lustfull and harassing (preferably anything but the ones feling offended)...for it to not be phobia for another sexual orientation and equality? Mmm so some sexual orientations need to be the ones displaying certain behavior? B*tch please, talk about the pot calling the kettle black and hypocrisy. The audacity!? Anyone can display those behaviors thats the whole point
Downvotes to transpohia comments? Of course..I think it's just that to most people it seem radical to see a problem where there is none and drop a series for that when sorry to whoever it may offend but there was no transphobia here.
It was literally like 5 panels and the setting of a lustfull harassing character who was way too forward with his advances regardless if the was trans, hetero or another gay.
The punch by a gangster?! First he is a GANGSTER so punch would have been delivered even if it was a gay man or hetero woman. He fucking rejected the advanced at some point so he was being harassed.
To some point the ladyboy appearance even has logic about the chapter context where the gangster is tolerating the advances mostly thinking it's a woman which he is used to but recoils when he finds there is d*ck involved even though he has no problem with the main character having d*ck.
So yeah in a orgy party full mostly of horny people belonging to that sex party scene there are bound to be "lustfull" disrespectfull people regardless of what they are...even trans ones...So my question is... it should have been a gay man or a hetero woman being forwardly harassing for it to not be phobia? Seems hypocritical much.
Maybe forward is not the word but a harassing lustfull dcharacter? Again doesn't matter it could be anyone that the main point of equality, being trans, hetero, gay or whatever does not makes you unable of harassing someone.
So now it needs to be a character with a specific genre or sexual orientation being lustfull and harassing (preferably anything but the ones feling offended)...for it to not be phobia for another sexual orientation and equality? Mmm so some sexual orientations need to be the ones displaying certain behavior? B*tch please, talk about the pot calling the kettle black and hypocrisy. The audacity!? Anyone can display those behaviors thats the whole point