I was looking for this comment. I knew it was serious moment but I found it ridiculous. It was overkill. He could just break his neck, stab him straight in the head or something. The blunt object thing made it seem stupid.
I mean stab him in the neck or the heart, cut an crucial artery and let him bleed. Whatever looked just as bloody but smarter and better than the stupid blunt stick
oh i was about to write a comment about this guess i don't have to. but like...i get it there are rules, you break them you die (i don't agree but ok). But beating someone to death? Why? That's just...merciless. Is it to scare ppl into not breaking the rules? Killing them is enough to scare them off. that's so fucked up
Bro that's so funny, you couldnt think of ANY more humane way to kill that guy than beating him with a blunt object for an extended period of time??? Reallyyyy??