Ok, so how the author portrayed this story is problematic, but there's a bit I'm curious about.
To start off, there's a theory then pedophilia is partly nature or innate, so is it bad when it's not acted upon? Like in this case, ML never gets handsy with MC when he was young. He didn't even show MC how he was lusting after him (since MC said he never noticed ML's weird gaze before).
And let's not think about whether the author did a bad job or is the story is harmful, but just whether ML was bad for being attracted to ML since he was young but never act upon or allude to it.
Ok, so how the author portrayed this story is problematic, but there's a bit I'm curious about.
To start off, there's a theory then pedophilia is partly nature or innate, so is it bad when it's not acted upon? Like in this case, ML never gets handsy with MC when he was young. He didn't even show MC how he was lusting after him (since MC said he never noticed ML's weird gaze before).
And let's not think about whether the author did a bad job or is the story is harmful, but just whether ML was bad for being attracted to ML since he was young but never act upon or allude to it.