
Ohh, yeah, I didn't feel like reading into the comment section and had just realized this is the same artist as sadistic beauty. Loved both side stories, it was great
I thought it'd be something actually illegal but it turned out to be moral policing... in a pirating site. Yikes. Post-2020 readers are really something else when it comes to fictional puppets.

Rape apologist? Where did you get that from. I stand highly against rape. If you know me, I have even asked for consensual content in my question.
I’m stating a fact, it’s not illegal for authors to make rape. And I’m not here to moral police like you, because I know what I read. It’s not illegal, sorry.
It would be a blessing if you knew your facts.

You did read it. Your reading list has stated you READ a lot of the stories I KNOW has RAPE IN it, so you’re being a hypocrite. Poor of you, but still continue to blindly go in and read without checking beforehand. Sounds like a repeated “mistake”.
Reading Pearl Boy is insane. Even I haven’t added that shit to my list of done reading. You’re a rape apologist, projecting onto me.

Their a freaking difference between reading stories that normalise rape and those how condemned it ?? Pleas, i know your 2 lasting braincells are too busy fighting for the 3rd place but try using it.
Plus, you're the one saying that bc i read bk I'm a rape apologist. Reading stories that normalise rape and defending them makes you a rape apologist (aka you). Reading bl does not
Associating bl with rape apology says so much about you and your view of gay people amd gay relationship.
Rape apologist, dumb, and with a gay fetish and internalised homophobia. Crazy
What's up with the comment section? Why did someone insinuate that the author's a criminal for drawing porn, what happened there
Edit: It was getting ridiculous and absolutely nowhere. Having one correct point but a bad attitude is never gonna change people's views. This is a nonsense noncon yaoi. Most of its readers are either women or AFAB, as in, people who are prone to be victims of assault. Calling people rape apologist is not going to get your point across.
A rape survivor calling another rape survivor a rape apologist does nothing to anyone. It's even more boggling because you clearly said that cnc is fine because it does have consent. What does that mean for those who post cnc content on the internet? Are they also perpetuating rape culture by performing cnc?
Hypothetical question. Don't answer. It's tiring watching you fight a pointless battle.