They are equally bad.
I want to say why but i'll prolly end up writing essay about that lol.
I'll just say it's the result of common problematic tropey about top/bottom role and reader projection.
OMG YES, I HAVE SEEN SO MANY STORIES THAT HAVE GROOMER AS THE BOTTOM AND PEOPLE DON'T CARE.
Ngl the boundary between a puppy boyfriend and one you made yourself has gotten thin around here. I care it’s just I analyze them differently.
Personally I Rate them in rank of permission.
- If the person was raised from before they were 12 negative
-calling the younger dude baby or innocent and pure is -2000 points
- If the initiator wasn’t the youngest I don’t want it. *Drop the story*
- if the older person is in turmoil over it and doesn’t instantly go with it +1
- if they aren’t actually related and if they r legal … now ig? already.
- I don’t wanna see the seggs
-I don’t want to see the younger one say no in the bedroom and they keep going.
- no crying fuck it. This trope ruins the tear trope any liquid -1000 points.
U know what this trope starts with a -50 stars because sometimes it doesn’t have to be creepy a messed up. Sometimes it’s sweet but it’s rare and I don’t wanna see it. As often as I do now
To me it’s basically always a no if one of the parties is groomed. With bottom groomers, authors usually try to make them look all innocent, which is what bothers me a lot.
It’s the childlike think I don’t like. Y do they have to look 10 dating a 30 year old man with a linebacker build
Lmao yeah that is common too.
What really makes me sad is that the community would not be upset about this super obvious grooming if the guide was the top. There are countless, literally countless, manhwa where the child is the top and everyone thinks that's fine. It turns out the community only sees grooming when the child is the bottom. Is that homophobia or misandry?