funny how ppl are uncomfortable with the pedophilia and not that farmer raping a chicken hybrid
real
Same with the cow in like the first two chapters. But if you’re reading this far obviously that was not a deal breaker
Ok cvntmaxxing gtfo if weird why still here cvnt?
Somebody’s offended
truth bomb!! bash ur rotten head against a wall pls, your lovely goon material is also rape :3
didn’t rly even read it, i only saw that one panel of the chicken on dc and barfed
Suuuuuuuure you didn't read it lmao
believe what you want?? being mentally challenged is fine too
A dub/non-con kink is one thing, pedophillia is something entirely different. Holy shit
No one is saying rape should be normalised either. Be aware though- I used to heavily avoid anything depicting a lack of consent, but I realised after dating my bottom boyfriend that having a non-con kink is fine. This story itself is more dub than non too. That may be crazy and extreme to some- but it really isn’t ngl. I realised myself that having a hissy fit over it is really embarrassing. Normal adults have this kink. In the case of this work as well, it’s supposed to be light hearted, if that wasn’t obvious.
However, child sexualisation is actually disgusting. Don’t ever treat a stupid kink like it equates to that.
You gotta remember the real world exists, and internet morality isn’t the golden standard. If anything, it’s a bit elitist at times. Expecting everyone to follow your sense of right and wrong too..?
Overall, I think it should be extremely obvious that child sexualisation is a thousandfold worse.
What the fuck.
Yeah… because one is super fictional and impossible (cat girls/boys??? What does the chicken part matter?) also mentioning what I said above, dub-con is fine, get off your high horse-
while the other represents pedophilia in a way… uh yeah, people SHOULD be uncomfortable with it, even if not for the other stuff. That’s normal.
you’re using dub con in a gross generalization that’s not even remotely common irl, stop being delusional lmao. you’re so desensitized to the point that you justify literal sexual violence, i get that people enjoy that stuff but it’s unnecessary for you to label it as the norm and ignore everything else, you just look like a clown
Dub con in a gross generalization? I don’t know what you even mean by that.
Dubious consent is content which lacks a clear distinction of consent, meaning it can either be consensual or non-consensual. It is not made clear.
Non-consent is obvious in how it is more brutal and obviously rape. That can still be a kink and be fine.
Tell me how a fictional story depicting dub-con or non-con is sexual violence? The only reasons I would be de-sensitised is because unfortunately I am a victim myself.
But doesn’t it suck that I need to bring up that I am a victim of CSA to make my point matter here? No. Don’t try and tell ME that a light hearted story that doesn’t explicitly state consent is on the same level as my trauma and experience in sexual assault.
I and most people with common sense can tell this is fictional and not how you treat people or relationships in the real world.
Now, I can make this argument for child sexualization, because it differs.
When you have a kink for rape/non-con, you have the inherent arousal from the concept, but you can avoid acting on that desire, because ultimately you understand consent matters. This is how certain relationships work. Before hand- a consent to non-consent is stated, with of course, a safeword.
When you have an attraction to CHILDREN, and this is due to consumed media, while you may not ever act on this desire, it is inherently wrong and harmful to yourself to allow these desires, as it goes against the natural law of the human mind. This is an illness, not a kink. Attraction to children is always sick and should be treated.
Tell me, are people reading this comic going to go out and rape someone?
No.
Leave that up to conservative white men that try and act like model citizens, politicians, Loli/shotacons (a community which have commonly been outed for child grooming or worse. Who would have guessed…), neo-nazis that treat women like property, and so on.
Overall, I know I can’t change your mind. That’s fine though, I have said my piece. I know why my morals are how they are, because I have thoroughly explored them and communicated with others to know their unique experiences and reasons for enjoying this type of content, despite XYZ.
I will never doubt my own opinion because you think I am a clown, because I am confident that I have come to this point in my morals because I have grown, matured, and I do not see the world in black and white.
All I can say is, sorry morals differ, I guess?
I can only hope you will mature as well. Have a good day.
Fr they need help
i’m a literal victim too and i stand by what i said cuz people on the internet are desensitized unintentionally all the time, dub con is still considered rape literally because there is not clear distinction of the person reciprocating and giving consent to the others demands. also nothing lighthearted about fetish content lmfao
No no, he’s got a point. One is often a kink that can be consensual and ethical irl. Every scene can for a fact be replicated consensually irl dispite this fictional setting. The other is Child sexual content. Which in no way, shape, or form can be consensual.
There was no child sexual content tho? Like literally nowhere is a child shown in a sexual content. There is and adult version of a child character shown. Its not child porn
you’re using dubcon as a kink in a consensual setting, i wasn’t talking referring to that in the first place. i used the scenario in this story as my reference and the dubcon here is just rape
You’re right but the conversation shifted from aged up M2 to about how this character was only represented to readers as a child prior to the recent update, And how people would rightfully feel uncomfortable about such an abrupt age up and tone shift. The OG commenter tried to compare pedophilia and rape kink presented in the comments when they said that people have an issue with one but not other. My comment was merely to point out that one can be done safely and consensually. Which pedophilia cannot.
Okay, so I understand M2 was originally meant to be an adult. Important thing is- he’s not.
Now maybe the author doesn’t know about all these moral things when it comes to fiction. I get it, we can’t expect everyone to be aware of the thousands of weird factors. What’s important is that when someone is informed “hey, so this might be a bit much”, that they take a step back and consider it.
What we don’t need is people trying to justify this. We don’t have the full progression of M2 from child to adult. M2 to most readers is just a child, and that puts him- for most normal people- into the “EXTREMELY OFF LIMITS” category. Much like how Fluffy hopefully will never be sexualised because he seems to have been an actual dog originally.
So- While its not the worst thing in the world, given M2 is at least being depicted as an adult, I think others need to respect the readers who feel uncomfortable given M2 was never an adult to us before hand. Suddenly seeing him as one and immediately in a sexual context is understandably going to feel gross.