
Adding r@pe in a story without making it graphic and showing that it is a traumatizing and deeply damaging thing? Not necessary, but go for it, if it adds to the story.
Adding r@pe in a story, making it graphic just because corn sells and brushing it off as if normal daily occurrence + romanticizing it? Not necessary, harmful and displays lazy writing.

It is never necessary. The way most author does it is romanticizing it and glossing over it. Most of them use rape as a plot device to basically build some sort of attraction between two characters base on the sexual act they're having and they'll give them this half ass redemption...So it's literally just lazy writing...And there are some authors who are just sick in the head and create shit like reverse thinking up.

i mean sure, it can be necessary, if its treated like the crime it is. for example in stigma, or wet sand. when its treated like it should be treated, not glorified or brushed over or used as fetish material for weirdos. i dont believe drawing it out in extreme detail and focusing on the 'pleasure' that the victim & rapist feel is necessary at all, i think thats when u know its just a kink for these authors

Rape scenes between the main characters? Unnecessary. A relationship based on violence is a bad one.
Rape scenes between mains and a past/current trauma? Sure. Just don't draw it in detail. Hint at it or smth.
My reasoning for this is because crimes still exist even in the fictional world and for a character to have been a victim and survived and is getting better through whatever means is good story telling. But a story that focuses on the sexual violence between a relationship and romanticizes it is bad story telling.
Do y'all think having r@pe scenes in a story is necessary or what you do guys think the authors are thinking during the making of that part?