I cant get past the fact theyre both trauma bonded 💀 i just know that uke is all 'i lov...

unless your brain is too porn rotted to realize, reverse rape is just rape.
this term is already ridiculous if you actually know what it refers to, but it makes even less sense in this context. be so fr.

Im not sure why youre being aggressive... to a term used...?? Im just referring to it as that since some of the comments I saw were using that as the term for the seme's experience and others couldnt tell if it was what it was which was, indeed, [ rape ]. Considering there's not a lot of changes since the 2010s and rape continues to be a cheap plot device used by many authors to segue couples into a relationship, Ive noticed bl readers do have a hard time reading the lines of some interactions even when its already written/drawn/implied in monologue and call it for what it is. It's not that deep, just a term. Are you okay, genuinely? We can continue the discussion without the attitude.

you were talking in the original comment as if you acknowledged that "reverse rape" is "a thing" and even said "how weird" as if you know shit. "reverse rape" is just rape.
people use the term "reverse rape" from an outdated belief that only women can be raped, or only penetration from the aggressor is rape. or like I said, from porn.

If you need me to spell it out, it makes even less sense here since it's both men involved. imagine if it were the other way around and the uke was the one doing the penetrating, yall wouldn't even be questioning if it's rape. it shows just how little you all think of male victims of rape.

the comment section and your confusion on whether it is actually rape shows how shallow your understanding on the topic is and how lacking in critical thinking skills you are. from the depiction in the flashback, it didn't matter if the seme felt good, he was still the victim of that interaction because he was not willing in that encounter. if that was not enough, he even acknowledges it's rape later on.

media literacy really is dead if you're still talking about "reverse rape", ooh, and "it's not that deep" is also what people with zero critical thinking skills say all the time.

I'm just pissed at everyone in this section being such uneducated and immature brats. peace out.

like if yall think you're so morally superior then at least know what you're talking about it's embarrasing

I dont understand why your anger is directed at me?????? Seriously dude, wasnt planning to reply but all the things you outlined were basically my sentiments just in shorter form because I tend to get auto cut in the comments section whenever my comment gets too long and I didnt want to deal with that.

I do acknowledge that rape is a real thing regardless of genders and abhor it still being a part of a lot of bls especially when its not handled properly in the narrative or isnt actually necessary for the plot to move. If you go back to Chapter 1 page 20, the scanlation translator left a comment on the bottom right of the panel stating that the initial text used when the seme was talking about his rape was using the term 'reverse rape' which they called BS and I initially read that as them not acknowledging that the seme was raped which is what I referred to as 'being weird'. Like, what he experienced indeed was rape and I call bull on anyone who doesnt acknowledge that. Whether I understood the translator's comment in the right context or misconstrued it, I never thought to invalidate the experience nor was I thinking of it as not being real or thinking in a gooner mindset that it cant be raped cuz men cant be raped or only women get raped, you've allowed yourself to reach that conclusion. I do unfortunately know some shit, I have had the displeasure of almost experiencing that from men as a child and I have male and female friends who have had to go through that and I am devastated for them.

Secondly, I dont know why youre going off on me, your third paragraph is a whole spiel of what my reply to you was. I know the ML was raped. Period. I am not confused the way you're lumping me with the other commentors. If my initial reply didnt make sense, I expressed that a lot of the commentors under this story are confused with scenarios like what the ML went through just because he wasnt the one penetrated and felt good. I expressed frustration how rape is still being used as a plot device and how a lot of readers dont pick up on it being rape even when its implied, drawn, spoken in monologue in the page just cuz the word 'feeling good' or the character was cumming was being thrown in.

You're so busy getting worked up, you didnt even try to make sense of what Ive been trying to say.

TLDR:
- Rape IS bad
- I dislike it being used as a plot device for this story and other works of BL
- If I understood correctly the translator's words in chapter one to that of "haha they werent actually raped thats BS" then my response to that is NO, that's a stupid thing to say. ML was clearly raped, that's nothing to mock about.
- If I misunderstood it wrong and translator meant to say "cant believe they used the term reverse rape to call what ML went through, that's BS", my response would be HELL YEAH IT IS BS. We shouldnt be down playing what he went through.
- Please chill the fuck down, Im not reading into all this with your definition of reverse rape and dont agree to what the term stands for in your definition because thats a fucked up view of who is getting raped or not. Im viewing it as the non-penetration way that the ML experienced since he's the one who penetrated although it was not of his consent.
- Im miffed the other readers are confused and trying to convey that there hasnt been a lot of plot device change since the 2010s seeing as I still read a lot of BL from that time to now with authors using BL as a way for a couple to connect and make a relationship which I find is a terrible way to start off and wish rape would be used less for a lot of stories that end up being light hearted or feel good.
- Lastly, "its just a term" is me referring to reverse rape in the context of ((non-consensual sex in that the victim was the one being forced to fuck someone and was not the one being penetrated re: the ML's situation)) and not your context of ((only women can be raped, no way men can be raped, etc.))

Im not gonna claim moral superiority out here cuz I know we all have different interpretations and feelings on the story. Take a step back and re-assess your aggression. I am not the one to take it out upon. Whether you're gonna continue demonizing my words is on you. This is my final reply to you.