Responses
To be specific. It was a rape. Done by the "kid". So take that how you will ethically. The author shouldn't have written it regardless but also... Idk what to consider this honestly
This problem is a symptom for alotta webtoons out there. The authors think just because the pedophile is a bottom, that makes them less pedophile. This is just like the other webtoon called something about being lovely or whatever. The bottom is a groomer. He took care of the kid throughout, and then had sex with them later on.
"This child who looks like a child and acts like a child isn't actually a child, they're a thousand-year-old vampire so it's okay if I have sex with them."
That is some pedophile nonsense. You all know it's pedophile nonsense. If you're reading this and enjoying it congratulations, you're pedophile nonsense.
This community should be better than this. I'm deeply ashamed of all of you.