No concrete proof, but hunches and plausible evidence are real things. Most people would at the very least side eye a lawyer who had 3 clients commit suc*de right after their cases close. While that’s not proof of guilt, let’s couple the fact that Inseop is incredibly strange. He practically cosplays as a human, always saying the right thing, but never saying too much, always conveniently at the right place and time. If you met someone like him in person, you’d probably be very wary and stay away from him. There’s too many coincidences that go on around him. For law enforcement, would be a person of interest for very good reason.
You know intuition is a thing. Especially a detective would have one..
Plausible evidence or hunch isnt enough reason for a detective to follow someone around. They literally shouldn't be doing that. Maybe in stories but not in real.life. even if the same bad thing happens around one person it doesnt mean it's them that did it. It's suspicious but it's still not plausible evidence if the same crimes happen around one person. It would make him a person of interest sure but it still doesn't mean anything further. Just that he's suspicious-still not enough reason to.follow him around.
I know but it still doesn't mean he did it. Intuition isn't evidence.
That wasn’t the argument. I’m explaining why he’d be a person of interest. Obviously he’s not getting arrested off intuition alone.
And I was originally saying it's too soon for him to just know it's him, no suspense on that part. I didn't say anything about arrests(〜￣△￣)〜
Honestly I wish the detective didn't suspect Inseop like it's too sudden and early. It's kinda unrealistic. There's no buildup he just automatically knows it's him when he doesn’t have concrete proof yet