You know, I usually wont bother with fiction-logic but kinda wondering if some people in the comment really would "justified" anything in rl as long as it has "proper" reason because what the heck u all so pressed to said that u wont agreeing with him just "because" his past? Like should that an easy logic? Wrong is wrong. Nuance is just to understand the root so it wont happen in the future from other people.
You know, I usually wont bother with fiction-logic but kinda wondering if some people in the comment really would "justified" anything in rl as long as it has "proper" reason because what the heck u all so pressed to said that u wont agreeing with him just "because" his past? Like should that an easy logic? Wrong is wrong. Nuance is just to understand the root so it wont happen in the future from other people.