Jaja, ¿cómo? Si los consumidores somos responsables de lo que consumimos, especialmente cuando está dirigido a un público adulto, se supone que nosotros entendemos qué está bien y mal, no ocupamos que una historia nos enseñe moralidad, a menos que la nuestra sea de papel (y aún así, la culpa recae enteramente sobre nosotros, qué decidimos hacer con la información que se nos presenta en una historia ficticia es cosa nuestra).
Pero bueno, los antis son una cosa curiosa de internet. Muting this.
You realise what you said is pure bullshit that's why even before proceeding with a conversation,you're just muting it. Also did you even read half of the comment I wrote earlier? Or are you just flinging towards nothing? Cause according to you if an author even wrote of p*dophilia or inc*st as a fetish p*rn it wouldn't be wrong cause adult audiences would know what not to do? So it's always dependant on it's audiences? Also you clearly ignored the fact that I wrote about younger audiences who are more susceptible to grooming and desensitization towards to fiction? Some of you would go such lengths to protect your favourite piece of fiction instead of accepting that they do have flaws.
Young people aren't at fault for being exposed to adult content obviously. It's their supervisors' fault. And you can preach all you want about how bad rape is in a mindful attempt to protect unsupervised teens, but this doesn't make the story bad and harmful in and of itself, because it's not misrepresented and romanticized in a way that aims to fetishize it or "casualise it". You are missing hard by commenting this under this story, at least at this point in time. Here we are seeing the perspective of both men, the one who's enticed by violence and the other who's disgusted. This is the reality of rape, one gets off on it and the other suffers from it. And lol, the people represented here, they aren't a minority or a crazy unicorn. There are infinite people among us who get exploited and swept up with people of bad intentions. There is no attempt to make it look casual, it IS the reality.
This story is narrating the life and dynamic of two adults, it's complex, messy and morally questionable. These qualities are nothing crazy or abnormal, they're a part of the truth of being an adult. You can clearly see it in this chapter that sex can be used as a means to assert dominance and manipulate. But again it's up to the adult mind to grasp this contextually. It's funny how you only draw the line on rape here when they made a deal which entailed one of them beating the other unconscious. We cannot remove all real representation of violence, of reality itself in fact, women's struggles, misogyny, etc. just because parents aren't doing their jobs. That's not how the world works and ever will (and ever should imo) whether you like it or not. You are pinning the blame on the wrong person in this case.
Real representation also doesn't have a certain look to it. We love sugarcoating the reality to make it digestible, but the reality is raw and deeply fucked up. There's this peculiar ability that's reserved only for the few, masterful, cognitively developed, mature brains even amongst adults, to acknowledge that often, even the romanticisation of violence serves the plot, and fiction generally, in an educational way. For example, when the story is told from the perspective of an aggressor, or simply someone who's been traumatised in their lives and doesn't cope with their problems the way society deems acceptable. You get to peek into their worldview and how they process emotion, violence, attachment. They're not alien, they're human. But again, that's too woke for many dumb hoes because they don't understand the complexity of being a human with trauma in a society that condemns and vilifies the victim for not coping the socially compromised way instead of the real perpetrator, and the fact that it's a reality we are surrounded by in real time.
I'm being sarcastic, just for clarification. I'm not dragging your profile, I'm saying that your bio and your questions on your profile indicate that you're a minor. And it's the staple of immaturity to resort to insults when someone challenges your perspective or when you don't understand it, so that's telling. I rest my case here tho be blessed x.
How can it be challenging my perspective when you stated absolutely nothing? You're just saying that there is pure evil in society and it can't be changed to a comment stating how fiction has effected reality for years? Obviously you're jumping and attacking nothing? Also this comment was directed to a person who said rape in fiction doesn't have any effect on reality? Besides im not stating my opinion but rather years of study made in psychology department with several individuals working.Now that you mention being a minor means not realising what a critical perspective is,do you realise how slow that sounds? A person's perspective simply cant be measured by the age they are.Again I was not attacking or disrespecting your perspective because you had no perspective to uphold atleast in this case. Now then I think I don't want to continue this conversation with you any longer. Thank you <3

That is the most tone deaf thing I've heard in a while. It just takes a quick google search to see how badly violence and aggression in fiction desensitizes it's younger audience,making them more prone to be the aggressor themselves. There's been years of study going around how casual portrayal of harassment in the name of love in films has caused women years of suffering simply because men don't realise fiction isn't reality. Also it's not just about reading it but about every authors overuse of graphic description of rape disguised as consensual sex. Because CLEARLY they don't realise the depth of the situation they're writing.