Wow i agree as well and also ..he is not even forcing himself on anyone
Its not shown that people are lusting on her but they think she is adorable
Everyone adores her
Though the times they have shown here, made it normal for sleeping with such young girls and there are lot of scenes in such comics where it happens
But here actually the opposite is happening, oh and that "bathing" is forced on her by the workers only using that world's logic
Our king is so considerate :') he didn't come up with that
The thing is that the king doesn't know this, the character nina could have been some random ass kid that hadn't reincarnated. I get what you mean but the potential for the king to act weird towards a kid (who just happens to be reincarnated) still rubs me the wrong way. I'm so conflicted???
All I can say is that this action are normal in the past, also given that the story's timeline is not in the modern time sooooooo....... It's still conflicting HAHAHAHAHHA
Exactly. At that time/era, Nina's age is already marriageable.
Pedophilia is wrong, no doubt, but I think alot of people are missing the basis of the law, which is the mental capacity to consent. The law is built upon the fact that minors are not mentally mature enough to consent, but if the heroine is mentally 35 and an adult, that would basically render the basis of the law redundant right?
Hahah, I just wanted to toss that out and ask what you guys thought.