
Guys, you do know you don’t have to read it if you don’t like the trope it’s MINGWA. You’ve probably read BJ Alex and you’ve finally thought at chapter 60+ “oh they’re not gettin anywhere.”
I personally think it’s realistic. Too many relationships I’ve seen where two people are toxic to each other and they continue to go back to each other and do the same thing. We all know at like 80+ they’re gonna start acknowledging relationships.

There isn’t a problem..I just said it’s useless to criticize. You’re reading what you wanna read because you disagree and that’s fine, disagree all you want. Don’t twist my words.
Yes, there’s reasons, never once said there wasn’t; I gave my opinion and said why it’d never change for those who want it too. If you really read what I said, you’d notice I never once complimented the story besides calling it realism. Don’t make it something it isn’t, I’m not looking for a two day long argument.
Anti-shotacons crying about the hiatus chapter as if he’s not aged up there..calm down, we literally got animal guys with both dicks and pussies
Dick and pussy up my ass so sorry for feeling iffy about the child character being put in lingerie regardless of him being given a larger body!
Nobody gives a fuck, just don’t read that singular panel LMAO, how do yall live like this dude
Oh my gawd dude just understand why people are weirded out by it
No, I don’t because you don’t HAVE to read it it’s one singular panel, either shut the fuck up or forget about it
No, actually i was so surprised to see that this actually something that sparked controversy. People argue about anything
Exactly, since when was being intersex somehow worse than pdf shit
? In what way was the short synonymous with pedophilia?
Mind you this is just concept art of an adult m2 that is scrapped in the main story and is now shown as a bonus. So it’s highly definite that the m2 we see in the main story will stay as a child. M2 (as in the adult) was originally going to be apart of the main story and wasn’t going to be depicted as a child. Meanwhile the entirety of the story/plotline is about exploitation of what once were humans now turned hybrids that are now being used as livestock. So it’s quite hypocritical on overlooking the main themes of the story while getting upset over what is bonus/concept art.
Here’s the link of where the author showcased concept art:
https://x.com/NACHIOBOY/status/1943015916931027183?t=AM1cEqdcl1FTQcNQNsnrHA&s=19
Who even said that?? And aging a character up is now..pedophilia? Yall are so something else
It is though. It's very concerning so many people can't see that. We are turning into old men in barely legal porn genres and that gives me the chills
...wow.
The key difference between this and what you've said (besides the fact that one happens in REALITY with REAL people and the other pertains to a fictional story... but y'all hate hearing that so whatever) is that the men you're describing perv on barely legal girls BEFORE they even turn 18. And then use their age to justify why it's right. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't seen anyone sexualizing M2 at all. Even with the short being out, I still don't. Your weird ass analogy only works if the majority of readers were waiting for M2 to grow up specifically so they could objectify him. It doesn't even work on the author themselves, bc this short is concept art that came before the main story anyway.
Y'all love buzzer words and phrases... Critical thought though? Seemingly not so much.
...wow.
The key difference between this and what you've said (besides the fact that one happens in REALITY with REAL people and the other pertains to a fictional story... but y'all hate hearing that so whatever) is that the men you're describing perv on barely legal girls BEFORE they even turn 18. And then use their age to justify why it's right. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't seen anyone sexualizing M2 at all. Even with the short being out, I still don't. Your weird ass analogy only works if the majority of readers were waiting for M2 to grow up specifically so they could objectify him. It doesn't even work on the author themselves, bc this short is concept art that came before the main story anyway.
Y'all love buzzer words and phrases... Critical thought though? Seemingly not so much.
I hope u get my point one day. I'm dropping this anyways so it doesn't matter
Your point is moot, love. Your analogy was a trite attempt at moral appeal... that doesn't apply to this situation. There is a broader conversation to be had here but it's far from the one you think it is, and I'd question whether THIS specific comic needs to be the focus of it.