
This manhwa has nothing to do with the plagiarism case. It's "Daughter of the Emperor (DOTE)" NOVEL author accusing "Who made me a Princess (WMMAP)" NOVEL author. Both manhwas of DOTE and WMMAP are not really the subjects of the plagiarism case, instead, the case was/is referring to the novels of the story. This controversy broke out years ago and some people were quick to defend WMMAP because the art style is far better (honestly, that's not an argument), but the case was talking about how the first parts of the WMMAP novel seemed awfully similar to DOTE. Wherein the accused author allegedly just rephrased some of the sentences in the DOTE novel and put it in their own novel(WMMAP). Take note, the novels of these stories were written years ago when the trope "reborn as the princess with a tyrant father and hoping to survive by trying to gain his love" was not at all that known yet. The similarities were obvious at that time when you only have like a couple to compare. Apparently, DOTE was the first of its kind and now we have so much iterations that the premise doesn't feel plagiarized anymore.
I'm not updated as to why this case is being brought up again, but don't drag another manhwa that's unrelated to the issue. Unless there's a new plagiarism case where this manhwa or novel (The youngest princess) is involved.