Learn to differentiate fiction from reality. Stop coming back here just to say the same shit. Stop arguing with your feelings. The pedophilia you so desperately want to exist is nowhere to be found.
They are bitches barking don't mind them, these pathetic fools having nothing good in their life so they've villainized everyone here so as to feel good about themselves and "see us how down badly we are defending it". I seriously feel like slamming their heads on wall so that they get sone lost common sense
I’m sorry we ain’t arguing w our feelings but the feelings of y’all It’s so sad to see you guys blatantly defend this bullshit writing and plain cp No cp is not just actual porn but also an indirect indication I refuse to acknowledge this bullshit is some wholesome cute stuff with semi problematic themes after seeing what I’ve seen in the gallery of this manga
I’m sorry we ain’t arguing w our feelings but the feelings of y’allIt’s so sad to see you guys blatantly defend this bullshit writing and plain cpNo cp is not just actual porn but also an indirect indic... SIOPRO
“cp” and it’s just drawings. And you are arguing with feelings. What reason do you have to be against this manga other than your disgust reaction? That’s what I mean by “arguing with your feelings”.
Stop trying to virtue signaling, bro . Just enjoy problematic stuff without trying to moralize it as correct. Everyone knows what shota loli in fact is
Stop trying to virtue signaling, bro . Just enjoy problematic stuff without trying to moralize it as correct. Everyone knows what shota loli in fact is Vichy7777
What do you mean? How am I virtue signaling? I have no idea what you’re talking about.
“cp” and it’s just drawings. And you are arguing with feelings. What reason do you have to be against this manga other than your disgust reaction? That’s what I mean by “arguing with your feelings”. mellow
And byw cp can be drawn too this is not cp cause there is no porn not cause it is a drawing
Unless it’s a drawing of a real child then no it can’t. Are you saying it’s only fine since there’s no sexual content? mellow
I am not saying it is fine either way to begin with, you are bringing it being fine or not in the conversation. I am saying cp can also be drawn. Just like hetero porn can be drawn too. Same stuff. If a kid is drawn in porn, it is cp, it is literally tge name
I am not saying it is fine either way to begin with, you are bringing it being fine or not in the conversation. I am saying cp can also be drawn. Just like hetero porn can be drawn too. Same stuff. If a kid is ... Vichy7777
Unless it looks like a real child, no it isn’t. I brought it up because you told me to just enjoy it and not virtue signal, but now you’re saying it’s not fine either way. What are you arguing for here? Quit flip flopping.
Unless it looks like a real child, no it isn’t. I brought it up because you told me to just enjoy it and not virtue signal, but now you’re saying it’s not fine either way. What are you arguing for here? Q... mellow
The boy literally is a child, stop trying to moralize shotacon. You can enjoy something problematic without trying to paint it as moral it is not a crime. Cp is literally auto explained, nothing says it needs to be a real kid to be cp. Just like drawn porn is still porn
Unless it looks like a real child, no it isn’t. I brought it up because you told me to just enjoy it and not virtue signal, but now you’re saying it’s not fine either way. What are you arguing for here? Q... mellow
Arguing about you saying cp cannot be drawn, when it literally can, just like any kind of porn. If you draw gays fucking what will be the name? Gay porn, duh. Same thing
The boy literally is a child, stop trying to moralize shotacon. You can enjoy something problematic without trying to paint it as moral it is not a crime. Cp is literally auto explained, nothing says it needs ... Vichy7777
It is not a crime because it isn’t cp. Do you say that about all yaoi with a high school setting? Do you call furry porn animal abuse? You calling it that means you’re putting a real child and shotas on the same level. And that’s concerning.
It is not a crime because it isn’t cp. Do you say that about all yaoi with a high school setting? Do you call furry porn animal abuse? You calling it that means you’re putting a real child and shotas on the... mellow
It's cp, any type of sexual depiction involving a child is cp.Idk where you live but in my country any material that depicts sexual content of a child, fictional and real are both prosecutable.its socially unacceptable and illegal.you can get Locked up for possessing such content.What's concerning is that you're trying to moralise and defend pedophilia.
It's cp, any type of sexual depiction involving a child is cp.Idk where you live but in my country any material that depicts sexual content of a child, fictional and real are both prosecutable.its socially unac... Imemun
Nope, I agree with you that is literally what I am saying. Shota is peds, even without the porn it is peds content. It is just not cp cause there is no porn, but that does not make it unproblematic
It is not a crime because it isn’t cp. Do you say that about all yaoi with a high school setting? Do you call furry porn animal abuse? You calling it that means you’re putting a real child and shotas on the... mellow
No one is putting it on the same level be so fr. If we were we would say you should be in jail. Yes, I say that to bls that if they have porn and the boys are on middle school obviously? Shota is pedo content, it is not a secret
It's cp, any type of sexual depiction involving a child is cp.Idk where you live but in my country any material that depicts sexual content of a child, fictional and real are both prosecutable.its socially unac... Imemun
The one you should be replying is the person above me that is defending it BTW
No, pookie but continue you put it in a very clear way. These people just do not wanna admit shota is ped content Vichy7777
I am sure they'll continue defending it no matter how much you explain i mean look at their replies under every comment criticizing this manga they're basically trying to normalise shota content and paint it as something moral.
It's cp, any type of sexual depiction involving a child is cp.Idk where you live but in my country any material that depicts sexual content of a child, fictional and real are both prosecutable.its socially unac... Imemun
I dont base my morals on legality, thank you very much.
Learn to differentiate fiction from reality. Stop coming back here just to say the same shit. Stop arguing with your feelings. The pedophilia you so desperately want to exist is nowhere to be found.
They are bitches barking don't mind them, these pathetic fools having nothing good in their life so they've villainized everyone here so as to feel good about themselves and "see us how down badly we are defending it". I seriously feel like slamming their heads on wall so that they get sone lost common sense
I’m sorry we ain’t arguing w our feelings but the feelings of y’all
It’s so sad to see you guys blatantly defend this bullshit writing and plain cp
No cp is not just actual porn but also an indirect indication
I refuse to acknowledge this bullshit is some wholesome cute stuff with semi problematic themes after seeing what I’ve seen in the gallery of this manga
“cp” and it’s just drawings. And you are arguing with feelings. What reason do you have to be against this manga other than your disgust reaction? That’s what I mean by “arguing with your feelings”.
Stop trying to virtue signaling, bro . Just enjoy problematic stuff without trying to moralize it as correct. Everyone knows what shota loli in fact is
What do you mean? How am I virtue signaling? I have no idea what you’re talking about.
Trying to say this is not a peds work, be fr. It is literally shota, trying to moralize shota/loli is laughable
And byw cp can be drawn too this is not cp cause there is no porn not cause it is a drawing
Unless it’s a drawing of a real child then no it can’t. Are you saying it’s only fine since there’s no sexual content?
A drawing of a child is it to begin with, cp does not need to be a child that exist btw. Just needs to be a representation of a child in porn
I am not saying it is fine either way to begin with, you are bringing it being fine or not in the conversation. I am saying cp can also be drawn. Just like hetero porn can be drawn too. Same stuff. If a kid is drawn in porn, it is cp, it is literally tge name
Unless it looks like a real child, no it isn’t. I brought it up because you told me to just enjoy it and not virtue signal, but now you’re saying it’s not fine either way. What are you arguing for here? Quit flip flopping.
The boy literally is a child, stop trying to moralize shotacon. You can enjoy something problematic without trying to paint it as moral it is not a crime. Cp is literally auto explained, nothing says it needs to be a real kid to be cp. Just like drawn porn is still porn
Arguing about you saying cp cannot be drawn, when it literally can, just like any kind of porn. If you draw gays fucking what will be the name? Gay porn, duh. Same thing
It is not a crime because it isn’t cp. Do you say that about all yaoi with a high school setting? Do you call furry porn animal abuse? You calling it that means you’re putting a real child and shotas on the same level. And that’s concerning.
It's cp, any type of sexual depiction involving a child is cp.Idk where you live but in my country any material that depicts sexual content of a child, fictional and real are both prosecutable.its socially unacceptable and illegal.you can get Locked up for possessing such content.What's concerning is that you're trying to moralise and defend pedophilia.
Nope, I agree with you that is literally what I am saying. Shota is peds, even without the porn it is peds content. It is just not cp cause there is no porn, but that does not make it unproblematic
No one is putting it on the same level be so fr. If we were we would say you should be in jail. Yes, I say that to bls that if they have porn and the boys are on middle school obviously? Shota is pedo content, it is not a secret
The one you should be replying is the person above me that is defending it BTW
I think i replied to them tho?
No, pookie but continue you put it in a very clear way. These people just do not wanna admit shota is ped content
I am sure they'll continue defending it no matter how much you explain i mean look at their replies under every comment criticizing this manga they're basically trying to normalise shota content and paint it as something moral.
I dont base my morals on legality, thank you very much.
You call it pedo content and don’t think I should be locked up? Have some consistency for fucks sake.
That's what most of the rapists and pedophiles say when they get interrogated after committing a crime :)
So we should only believe what the law says? And not whether people are actually hurt? Do you not have a spine?