Arguing after being proven wrong

I'm curious.

What would YOU reply to a person who said something that's based on misinformation or hearsay and supposed personal expertise~. You then correct that person with FACTUAL evidence. Yet they still keep arguing their version of reality (or delusion, tbh).

CONTEXT:
(This is about art. A supposed part of the art was planned after a mistake was made, yet in an interview you can hear them talking about planning out the exact scene as is in the final. Even a staff working on the artwork has confirmed that fact.)

What would YOUR response be after previously staying nice and calm and factual?

Anything goes; meme posts, reply pics, serious answers, etc.. I'm just bored af, so gimme anything you got.

Sort: Newest / Hottest

▲
1

Arguing after being proven wrong [Answer]

PrettyMenSupremacy 17 10,2024

idk if you heard the term "You can't play chess with a pigeon" what ARE you supposed to say? can't argue with stupid, can't play chess with pigeons. Can't use logic with people that got no common sense. (As someone who uses more logos than pathos in arguments I hate these type of people) IT'S LIKE YOU CAN'T WIN MAN. so there isn't really a point to...... reply

17 10,2024

▲
1

Arguing after being proven wrong [Answer]

轻轻落下来的叶子 17 10,2024

1. reconsider if I'm sure I'm right. 2a. if I don't have evidence I am right that I can show them, then I can only treat the situation as though they are correct - even if I know I am right. 2b. if I have evidence to show I am right, then use it. 3a. if they start saying my evidence is wrong, without evidence that it is wrong, then just let th...... reply

17 10,2024

Answer the question