pride month is becoming degenerate

People stopped caring about what nsfw means and now sell depravity under a the LGBTQ+ label, thinking those two things are the things.

No, being gay isn't a kink.

No, kinks aren't part of that... whole mess of things.

I remember in high school being told that there was a book that the curriculum had to block that my teacher wanted us to see. It had... pretty explicit references to sex and most of us were minors and this book was like supposed to be educational towards a younger audience.

Or at least that what's my teacher said.

Now, given that I had already been reading straight up bl since... middle school, I didn't really care, but like, are you really going to make a bunch of 15-16 year old how this guy had anal sex before? For education?

And like, the book itself had a really good message, but at the same time... no.

Like, for a lack of a better word, people DO realize that the direct reference gay, lesbian etc etc is... sexual in nature? I feel like we've lost all connection to this and are now... labelling all sorts of stuff under inclusivity and shoving it into media, when kids... really shouldn't be reading it.

We were allowed to read a book with a very explicit metaphor for lesbian sex where they compared fingering another woman's vagina to unfolding a flower and how it made the other person moan as they rubbed each other's boobs.

And like, the kids in my class, they actively read that with such vehement interest it's clear that they're NOT there because it's some deep allegory for lesbianism and gay rights and so on, but because it's basically ao3 porn and yes we've probably all read ao3 porn by that age... but is it necessary to put it in class?

It wasn't even necessary and I was talking to someone else about this actually and it was about rape in books and bl and stuff (hentai for him because he reads gooner stuff lmao), but like the point that we both came to was that... if you are writing explicit shit, at some point, it loses meaning as some sort of critique and becomes porn.

Sure, maybe it's only two paragraphs, but what are you trying to accomplish? Do you need to write how someone moans when you finger them? Like how much of that is literary and how much of that is just... being a degenerate. For the lack of a better term.

If you're writing an expose on how rape is bad, for sure, there is some merit to being explicit, but like, that's like such a niche, and it didn't apply to that particular book.

And then you put this into real life, and you have these parades and stuff and like, you can go online and see like these five year olds saying how they are transgender and like YOU DO REALIZE THAT TO SOME DEGREE THERE IS THE IMPLICATION THAT KID IS SUGGESTING THEY WANT TO CUT THEIR DICK OFF. Like, that IS the direction.

LGBTQ+ is inherently about sexual traits, and I don't mean just fucking, but inherently like, anatomical level sexual traits. And anyone, ANYONE, who says elsewise is LYING. The so-called attraction is HORMONES. If you are calling yourself gay, then you are a probably a man who wants to have sex with a man. You want to idk rub dicks or stick it in (idk there are some people who are like my pronouns are she/him).

That is INHERENTLY sexual.

Questions about genders are inherently about physical sexual traits. Yes, your boobs, dicks, um vaginas, etc etc THOSE ARE PHYSICAL TRAITS USED THAT ARE INTENDED FOR SEXUAL USE.

Like idk why, I hear some people speak of them as separate things, or that their love is something super special when they create a new word to describe their love for someone who also created a new word for a new gender identity, like that's something... entirely different.

People who keep on trying to idk purify something that is inherently sexual, are just dumb. Like, this is ngl why people in the aroace community get so much shit for it too because here you have a group of people who LITERALLY EMBODY WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO "IMPLY", and people are like, pissed.

Because suddenly if you shove aroace people in, the difference becomes sexual and you can't wear a 'woke' hat and pretend you're like, goddamn angels. So they get so, so much shit for being aroace. I swear, this is the reason why. You put aroace and suddenly everyone else is like, oh it's your sexual orientation, it's your [sexual] orientation. This person represents what happens when you take it out (or something similar, you get the point, don't bother me about technicality, I literally do not care, love whoever you want).

And they want to cover it with love, so when they go to their goddamn parades they can dress like a STRIPPER and be like, "oh nononono, it's- it's a sign of my special type of love. It's something special. It's not inherently sexual, or rather it is, but it isn't like... THAT."

What is "that"?

It's sexuality. It's sex. It's who you want to bang in a hole or two holes or how many holes you want to bang someone in.

That's what it is.

And when you kick aroace people out, you get to say this shit. Because very suddenly, it's like you've removed the ONE GROUP who is blocking you from pretending that LGBTQ+ is some sort of kid-friendly thing.

Shoot me if you think I'm wrong, but I've spoken to people who HATE aroace people or who say they're not of the LGBTQ+ and I have grilled them for what they think and 90% of the time it's basically this but they add some sort of victim mentality like aroace people are targetting them for random ass shit.

Anyway so, on minors, look, if they grow up, or like they're 15-16 and they're like, "I'm sure I like girls", I 100% support it. Because I think like, around that age there is some confusion but most kids are going to start thinking about it by then. But like, we've been... slowly... ever so slowly pushing that age down...

And also, if you are like EIGHT and you are like, "I like girls". I will ALSO take it, but I'm assuming you are having cute crushes and you aren't thinking about how much you want to have sex with them. I don't think you're thinking of that if you're eight.

I think sex education is important. I think LGBTQ+ education is important because like we live in a world we're 70% of people are womanxman and that 30% is just going be confused.

But I don't think I need to see a goddamn dick on screen when I'm 11 because they invite some LGBTQ+ people to do this shit in front of us. And I don't think I need to walk around the streets and feel genuinely scared for an entire month that I might get fucking flashed because omg that's inclusivity. No, it's not. You're just making everyone who is part of the LGBTQ+ community look like a bunch of degens when they aren't.

Kinks and bondage are not a sexual identity, it's a sexual preference. There's a miniscule difference that MATTERS A LOT.

If you like anal sex or if you like idk what regular sex as a woman -- that is the equivalent of your so-called kinks and bondage. And I don't think gay people count under the umbrella of that and I don't think you should associate those two because you are now... creating the assumption that it is degenerate, when no it's not.

You don't choose you're gay. You choose to want anal sex.

And before someone goes like, oh some people can only get off of it, idrc. Still two different things to me.

I'm only thinking of this because there were like pride parades and I saw this like idk the term for it because they fucking change every two days, but someone basically dressed how I would imagine a stripper would in the middle of the street where KIDS can see you.

Like, I feel like before more of all of this was about acceptance, it was about, there are people who are different, and we as a community need to accept them. But like, as time went by... we started added so much random ass stuff that shouldn't be in the middle of the street.

And before someone calls me homophobic or transphobic, if a man can go up to a child and dress as a stripper and be called a pedo, for what reason, can't a transgender man can go up to a child and dressed as a stripper and be called a pedo.

Like, for all you want to tell me, that's self expression, idk if it's really valid anymore if you're... just encouraging... kids to see your dick in public. Like, I don't want to see a man or woman naked, with bondage, and walking around like, a dog on a leash, only to go up to a kid and start woofing or saying hello.

If that was my kid, I would take them AWAY. I don't care if that makes me anti-LGBTQ+, they can figure this shit out when they understand what it means to have a dommy mommy or whatever it's called.

And I'm not saying all LGBTQ+ people are like this, I highly doubt it, I think it's a very small number of them. But like, you wonder why there is such a huge pushback against gay rights and you have this small minority doing this stuff and you wonder why...

Anyway, I miss LGBTQ+ movements were actually about getting people to accept everyone. Not... some deranged kink display that makes me not want to go outside.