It's fiction until some of you normalise it

There's a serious flaw in the way these guys are approaching this(hopefully to most of you that's obvious). Reducing morality to whether or not children are produced overlooks the deeper ethical issues. Incest isn't just about genetics, it's about the psychological, emotional, and relational consequences that come with breaking family boundaries. Even in cases where people claim to "consent" those dynamics are rarely neutral, because families involve dependency, hierarchy, and vulnerability. That makes the idea of genuine consent far more complicated than these guys suggesting.
Citing history also doesn't strengthen their freaking statement. Many harmful practices were common in the past, slavery, child marriage, lack of bodily autonomy and we reject them today precisely because we've come to understand the damage they cause. The fact that something was done before does not make it morally acceptable.

In general , trying to treat this as a purely logical or biological question misses the point. The taboo exists not just because of reproduction risks, but because incest literally undermines trust, damages relationships, and often leaves lasting psychological harm. That's the part that gets erased when someone reduces the discussion to "no kids, no problem".


The fact that this needs to be explained to some people, is terrifying. It's why kids shouldn't lurk in this site. I'm not studying to become a psychologist for this shit but tbh, hope someone found it educational.