Something I don't genuinely get.
Is how are people okay with lolis and shotas because it's "fictional" like bruh that's a depiction of a child, doing sexual acts. You're weird! Like would they even have a problem with it if it's Live-action?? Cause technically "it's fictional" but like you'd know it's wrong to see an actual human child do that even if they're acting.
You never see in freaking movies where a child is depicted NUDE even if they're literally like the dead victim. You'd only see half of their body. Both are like fiction because those could be done with CGI but still, even by law that's punishable.
I studied psychology, learned about pedophillia and holy shit it's not like psychopath people where they just can't genuinely have empathy and feel anything, while pedophiles are just literally pedos. Nothing lacking in their Brain, they're self-aware of their crimes. Psychopath is actually something of impairment, like wtf I'd give them more empathy cause they're built that way from babies.
Because they want to feel better about themselves and convince that it's okay as long as it's fictional.
They defend sexualized depictions of children in fiction,like “lolis” or “shotas” and try to justify it by saying “it’s just fiction,” as if the lack of real world victims somehow makes it okay. But that completely ignores the psy......
2 reply
7 days
