Which is right?

Depends on what giving a chance means. If its a small mistake or if your partner improves and actively tries to change for small mistakes, that's fine. If they cheat, hit you, or push your clearly established boundaries, give them only one chance. The bottom line is, you cannot expect a different result by repeating the same actions. Don't let th......   reply

20 men one chance. To me I define a "chance" as he done fucked up or I've gotten sick of his shit to the point that I want to leave him, I give him a "chance" to rectify things. 20 times is asinine imo. I've been married for almost 10 years and my man has had 3 "chances". I can't imagine how one could accumulate 20, that would be a bunch of red fl......   reply

20 men. This is good because granted you have discernment and are able to work with people's flaws then I guess it'd be better to have more options to pick from.   reply

ur making me choose between two slightly different versions of hell?   reply

It really depends. Cheating? Stealing? MAYBE two chances if you get on your knees and beg me for it with that maid costume on   reply

Obviously 20 men one chance you can just use them like. Make sure they have money   1 reply

Bro ok so most people agree with me that 20 men one chance is better. My friends said that my answer means I’m not loyal and that I’m a player but I really don’t think so. It just shows that I’m not willing to waste my time on useless people.   reply

one man 20 chances... at least i get the familiarity over time instead of having to get to know and get comfortable with a new person each time an issue comes up   reply