Cestelle's answer page 36 (1136)

Under federal law child porn is, and I quote, "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting" that "depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is 'obscene'", or "depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in…sexual intercourse…and lacks serious literary, artistic, politic......   reply

Are we talking "like" as in they're cool and shit or "like" as in how y'all slobber over bnha characters? Regardless of how old you are, one's fine and the other's not. Shouldn't need to spell out which is which.   reply

Can we just take this and plaster it everywhere on the site thanks   reply

I mean meat, egg, and dairy industries *are* inhumane as fuck and cutting down on beef and dairy intake even if not removed altogether *would* reduce carbon emissions substantially... Like I'm not sayin' it's generally all-around better for the planet, but it's generally all-around better for the planet.   1 reply

Wait wait wait... so you got insecure that you were dressing strereotypically white and straight, so you bought... Flannel and jeans..? That's still stereotypically straight depending on where you live, and if you weren't dressing stereotypically white before you definitely are now. But now you're also purposefully trying to dress stereotypically......   2 reply

No one's "scared" of links. They're just obnoxious and no one wants to see them.   reply

Didn't Marvel try to do something similar and it was a complete and utter disaster? Why the hell would they think we would like this any better?   1 reply

The phrase you're looking for is "heteronormalizing lgbt+ relationships", and no, it's not "not a big issue". It's absolutely an issue. Making lgbt+ people "more digestible" for straight readers is fucking offensive. Purposely making lgbt+ relationships look "more like straight people's" for any reason is fucking bullshit and needs to stop.   1 reply

Can we like, maybe not use titles like that for clickbait? It's super distasteful...   2 reply

Snurgle and Shawty are missing   1 reply

I don't even use tiktok and even I understand she's a fucking hypocrite when it comes to taking the pandemic seriously. It's been the better part of a year now and she *still* cannot get it through her head that she needs to take this shit seriously.   1 reply

From the sharing pages? Shawty, Snurgle, Anzthiccy, Trixie, staytrashy, anonymous (the one with no profile picture, not the question mark one), Kerr, and then Oikawa/Tooru/Ollie/I-don't-even-know-if-they're-all-the-same-person and some people from their group of friends but they all changed their names so often that they're probably still here and ......   reply

Does "hot garbage" count as a genre? Serious answer: It doesn't really matter whether it's BL or not because at the end of the day it still depicted two men in a "relationship" and how it handled that is what's important. Which it handled by making one of them a psychopath and the other one a stalker... y'know, the sorts of things mlm people were......   2 reply

If you were able to get the link you're able to get your own fap material.   1 reply

Why would I need them from you when Google is free   reply

Fairly certain I'm all three of those and I've never even had my account restricted, let alone banned... Pretty sure the only real ways to get banned are to either post random shit in the spot for finding forgotten manga, be Felix, or be Felix: Bigotry Edition.   1 reply

Anything from the "my favorite genres are shounen and harem" crowd. You know the ones. Most of the YouTubers are part of that so it's literally just a public cesspool of bullshit. If you're looking for some shitty takes, they're certainly not hard to find.   reply

Fujo Twitter is literally just the worst parts of this site's userbase with added self-righteousness about spending money to fuel their gross ass rape fetishes. Why would you take anything they have to say even remotely seriously?   1 reply

Honestly sometimes the troll posts say something that a lot of people actually think and it's an opportunity to address something important, so I don't mind them that much. Not to mention a lot of the seriously shitty takes are treated like troll posts when the OP isn't actually trolling, they really just have shitty takes. What bothers me more is......   reply

Agreed, they don't really have much practical use beyond avoiding accidental conflict (see "/s" usage on Reddit), and even then they're used way more often than necessary. I especially don't like how neurotypical people will sit there thinking they're doing something for neurodivergent people with it. Like, it's so incredibly patronizing and infan......   5 reply