ik its a big age gap but when did he rape him? wasnt everything consensual since nagi asked first? genuinely confused
Yeah I don’t like the age gap but I agree with this
uhm uhm in law, sex with a minor despite having concern is still labelled as rape ;; statutory rape;;
sorry but that escaped me, how old was the uke? asking just from a legal pov cause i also dont like it when the age gap is put at an awkward age (like barely out of highschool and full grown 30 smth adult) but i thought this wasnt an illegal relationship
if im not mistaken the uke should be around the age lower than 18 since it's not mentioned either he's in his senior year in highschool ;; but then again i realized in Japan age for legal sex is after 13 if im not mistaken so I'm sorry for the misleading reply before therefore it's not considered rape;;
no its ok, as i said, its just from a legal standpoint. He did agree but the age gap is still kinda weird
Also remember, in Japan, women are allowed to marry at 16 and he is above that age. The age gap is definitely weird but it was also definitely consensual. Although I feel weird cause technically in japan, you're only considered an adult if you're 20 above.
So many conflicting laws here
more people are bothered by the fact that they're cousins instead of the fact that a 27 yr old raped a minor (and ik trash will defend this as fiction/legal in some countries and I'm not interested in responding to those dumb comments)