
I can understand that but when he's literally a doctor and a person how's repeatedly had power over kanghyuk, he's not a good person. Leave this man alone in the best interest of a person whom you supposedly harmed through your actions or indescritions, your happy isn't more important than the mental health of said individual. You can't even make the argument that what Dr. Han did was all necessary he's always at every turn of this story done what was in his self interests everyone else be damned.

with all due respect, if u really respect and understand the main point of what was told then don't lump it with contradictory. it's good to hear what other people say to a story and what they realize and understand because that's valid that the author is good enough to make ppl debate about it. but don't lump.
we have different perspective about human behavior but we don't know the different kinds right? i think the author believe that a person that have a bad past even if he is criminal or do that's unforgivable the author believe that person can change and have the slightest thing that can make them a better person. and that's how author portray Dr. Han an example of a person that can change despite his past behavior. ik im not making sense to ppl that doesn't want to give this a shot but idc.