
The earring wasn't in full sight though, without Candy , Cirrus probably wouldn't have found it before a long time ? And the earring was on the ground so it's possible someone vacuums it while vaccuum cleaning around the bed and never find it ! (? Am i right ?? So probably she didn't leave it on purpose?)

And it seems in more advanced chapters we only see Cirrus reaction to seeing them on his bed. (??) Right? I havent' read next chapter yet. So is it possible that they didn't get naughty to the point of stripping off clothes and having sex in full sight ?? _ I wonder if the mother in law knows about the video vigilance that Cirrus installed in his room. That would be so ... Incredibly well played and cruel from her , to stage everything so as to make Cirrus go completely mad and then accusing him of being a nutcase so that his dad would loose all trust in Cirrus' sanity. (??) Is she that manipulative and motivated to get rid of Cirrus (??)

I am really not sure this is accurate (maybe not in the littéral sense) but yeah they shouldn't have go to Cirrus' bedroom . And they shouldn't have kissed on his bed. What else do we see (I mean us the readers) _
Just how and why did they go to Cirrus' bedroom in the first place ? I mean think about the real evidence that we have. Do we even know they went there to get frisky in the first place ? (Maybe the mother in law had it in mind but not the father?) _ I just like to notice what do I derive from EVIDENCE = solid facts, and what does my mind builds on its own. _ personally from the images I have seen I didn't see the parents literally fuck in Cirrus' bed. (I didn't see it !)
Wait what does it mean when her stepmom left her earring under his bed on purpose???