
was i the one who attacked you for being sexually assaulted??? rape is when sex is forced upon you when you dont want it, and i dont know if youve read the entire argument but why exactly do you think this person is such a great person after they told me that im just as bad as the people who raped my family members?
sexual assault and rape go hand in hand and they both give you trauma, so i dont get it when you say that it wasnt rape, it was sexual assault
so what if the seme doesnt know about the grandma? is sexual assault okay if you dont know what theyre going through? youre saying that dan should have fought back against a professional martial artist with his job and grandma on the line?
"they care about rape survivors" made me laugh, like yeah sure, call me vile and disgusting, but aaying that im just as bad as the people who raped my sister, mother, and grandmother?

?????what
no i meant like coherency like in grammar, The sentences are structured very weirdly and I'm struggling to piece them apart, when you block someone, the person is unable to reply to your comments, try it yourself, it says "you are unable to reply due to the users settings, i can reply to you just fine?

are you guys from a different country? like im genuinely asking, because you guys are using terminology that I've never heard in my life, and your english is really hard to udnerstand. actor means a person whose profession is acting on the stage, in movies, or on television, if you had said "acting on bad faith", i would have understood

I was raped. I am a rape survivor. Rape is apart of SA. Not all of SA is rape. I bloody hell know what rape is. You can be a victim of SA and not rape. Toilet is a victim of SA. He was not raped.
You told them to kill themself. They were justified. Cyber bullying gives trauma. Your comments could give trauma. Dan was not rape. It is SA.
You don’t even know the bloody facts about SA and rape or the story. You can’t take responsibility for your actions.
Tora and TMSM, they care about rape survivors. You are vile and disgusting. You are bad as the people who raped your family as you don’t care about the trauma you caused and it causes the same types of trauma. You are a loser. TMSM was talking about the story. Go touch grass. You are out of touch with reality.

LMFAOOOOOOO okay now im confused, are SA survivors just less important than rape survivors to you now? you claim to support rape survivors, but i really don't think you do, because why would you say that about my family...? you're undermining other rape survivors (my family members who were raped???) and telling me that I'm as bad as their rapists? that really doesn't make sense to me at all.

see, this is what im talking about. your guys's sentences are structure so weirdly, "defeated person" wouldn't usually be paired with "you" at the beginning, since defeated is a verb. a more understandable sentence would be "you've been defeated"
and i don't understand the "keep degrading yourself" part, because not once have i degraded myself?
PLEASE PLEASE PELASE, answer my question. I'm asking this with no malice. at all. are you guys from a different country? because you seem to know each others terminology and you structure your sentences the same way, I'm not asking maliciously at all
also, can you elaborate in what he's getting his PhD in? because them it would be actually meaningful to tell me. definitely not english, right

ac·tor
/ˈaktər/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: actor; plural noun: actors
1.
a person whose profession is acting on the stage, in movies, or on television.
"fans now recognize James more as an actor than as a singer"
a person who behaves in a way that is not genuine.
"in war one must be a good actor"
2.
a participant in an action or process.

yes yes, i understand. but im asking you, do you think that SA survivors are less important than rape survivors? because that seems to be what you're getting at
if you read the entire argument, then you would've understood why, and you really seem to be tiptoeing around the fact that the person i was originally replying to said that dan felt good while being sexually assaulted and that he liked it, and that if you don't believe that he wouldn't like it because JKs dick is too big, then you should go look up a gay porn website and watch gay porn actors being fucked

another thing i dont understand, im advocating for sexual assault to not be looked down upon or for people to not say that the victim "felt good so it wasn't rape" and that "he could've fought back", THEY were the ones telling me that, so why exactly are you attacking me ??? arent you the one standing up for sexual assault ? so am i

I am not answering that question. That is not in my comments. Are you going to see a pink elephant next? And then expect me to explain why there is a pink elephant when it doesn’t exist? That is where you are getting at.
I read where they were talking to you and you just attacked them. They did not say Dan felt good while being sexually assaulted. Dan felt good after the sexually assaulted parts. You got confused. Dan likes the sex. TMSM is correct. You are in the wrong. You are lying. You are so dumb! Do you think I will believe you fucking lies. Some one said Dan would never realistically like it because JK dick is too big. TMSM said go look at porn site where no all of them are actors, dumbass, and see they love being it. You are triggered and you tried to harm others who never deserved it. You are a hypocrite and a fucking monster. You fucking gaslighter.

You never read the story. They didn’t say this BULLSHIT!!! The second one I can see but you twist it for your selfishness. You are fucked in the head. You are making the story is SA. It is only the first time. You judge the story wrong and you judge them wrong. Read the story and talk to them. You are defending nothing. You are disgusting. You are attacking good people.

thats not what im getting at, you keep talking about the difference between sexual assault survivors and rape survivors, as if there's a difference in their experiences or one is more important than the other. why exactly would you bring it up in the first place if you don't think so? that's why i asked that question, that's what i deduced.
dan felt good after the sexually assaulted parts? the problem is that he was sexually assaulted in the first place. when they had sex after he was assaulted, it felt good? that's what you're saying? that's so crazy to me. like actually.
insult after insult is what it is with you, its actually tiring because I'm trying to get my point across and all you do is reply with insults, its cheap
"do you think ill believe your fucking lies" I'm not a mind controller, if you want to stick by your ideas, do it. I'm not going to get inside your brain and replace your ideas with me??? you're the one that continues to reply in the first place.
i keep telling you to reread because i obviously already replied saying that i never explicitly told them to kill themself in the original reply, i told them to jump off a building (a lot more lighthearted than you would think when a native English speaker says it) and to exterminate themself from society (not even hinting at telling them to kill themself because why would i even say it twice? i meant it as if to say don't go out into society and tell these things to rape victims)
giving me a headache for real
I keep seeing people saying that Dan should leave JK and JK is toxic blah blah. That may be the case if they’re lovers, but they’re not. They’re in a paid relationship guys. Dan is with JK to pay his debt and JK is with Dan for sex. It’s purely transactional rn. Idk why the readers keep jumping the gun and being like “that’s not how you should treat your partner”