
Literally never called him flirtatious. Personally, I've also not been hating on him. I also looked at previous comments and most of them are So mild. Yall just love to get mad at other people more than at fictional characters.
I've just been burned many times before. Male leads simply shouldn't be introduced this definitively this early. He doesn't even know what romantic feelings are and he's already a simp.

You did imply he's being flirtatious by saying, "Attracted to a 1 year old". If you didn't think he was that way, why else would you say he's attracted unless you meant attached?
Ofc people are going to get mad at or talk to someone they disagree with because they obviously believe their wrong to some extreme, and there's nothing wrong with that. That's what a forum is for, for everyone's opinion (with exceptions to extremists).
It's weird because you're putting the children in an adult perspective. He's attached to her because he has no family who he can interact with regularly. The baby's brother studies all the time, the sister and him don't get along, and I doubt he can just interact with their parents freely. So hmm, I wonder why the only other child he can freely interact causes such an attachment. Also, I don't get why it's a big deal for an early introduction. Childhood friends get together all the time later in real life, and there's plenty of troupes with that style. But if that's how you feel so be it
Y'all better tone it down. Y'all are the only ones acting immature like a freaking child,how could you hate on Mikhail? he's a CHILD plus he never did anything wrong,if anything, he has only SAVED FL multiple times. Everyone hating on Mikhail are dumb bitches amh