“Woowon’s 'no' s were more for seoan to stop hurting himself, than a 'no' of total refusal of furthering the sex.”
finally someone who actually understood the flow of this chapter.
What do you mean by “ But i do have to point out the hilarious fact that if it was the other way around, the responses and comments here would've been totally different”?
if it were the other way around and the dialogue remained the same i dont think people would of been biased .
had it been woowon doing the same exact things to seoan, and the dialouge remained the same, most would've all came together calling it rape and sa, with maybe a little opposition from few. But because it's dub-con from a bottom to a top, it's seen as less serious.
Okay yeah I agree with you there then. That’s what I’ve been saying. Tops being forced by bottoms are less criticized than the other way, it’s sad.
You don't understand? All these people who are trying to defend seoan would be hurling curses at him...if the situation was reversed ತ_ತ
Oh yes I understand now. The OP already told me
While i wouldn't go as far as saying it was rape, the clarity of consent was ambiguous from one party. Dubious consent is not as harsh as rape, but it's still dubious nonetheless. That being said, i wouldn't call this rape (which is the total and definite absence of consent). Woowon's 'no' s were more for seoan to stop hurting himself, than a 'no' of total refusal of furthering the sex.
But i do have to point out the hilarious fact that if it was the other way around, the responses and comments here would've been totally different