Tf?

Gender studies . Like the white supremacists' studies and porn addicts' studies. Or those typical religious studies.
Bye, I just can't take someone who can't even define a woman and denies sex seriously.
Gender identity = sexist stereotypes
You can be a woman and not following societal pressures, but it doesn't make you a ma. Just like how a man enjoying make-up doesn't make him a woman.
Just say that you want to last word and move on

Yeah, but no.
Gender identity = sexist stereotypes
A man loving make-up and "feminine" stuff deemed by societies doesn't make him a woman.
Studies? I am crying. Just like studies made by white supremacists, porn addicts and religious people. All of these are based on faith and pseudo science.
Seriously dude, move on. Me not believing and endorsing in your bullshit doesn't hurt you. You just want everything catered to you.

comical how most trans people ive come across are generally atheists, and even the believer ones supple adaptability with practices and beliefs. also you really need to desist from perpetuating some fabricated, farcical stereotype about trans persons, plus, what ive been wondering about all this time is why in blazes did you comment under this manga aware it focalizes around a transman? why bother interacting with or remarking on something you possess disdain for?

now,you're trying to bamboozle me into believing that im trying to reinforce my beliefs on you, don't alter the narrative, as if you're not the one disseminating vile remarks about things you don't adhere to, and you literally entered the comments knowingly (summary explicitly mentioned transman) to dispense your shit

How do you think people form their individual thoughts if they don't read the content? The manga doesn't have graphic rape and sexual assaults and murder, so i fail to see why I should not read it.
Plus, you're the one keeping replying to me

Cool stories. But believing that you're the other gender is a form of believing in a theistic ideology

your reduction of gender identity to "sexist stereotypes" is a gross oversimplification. gender identity pertains to an individual's intrinsic sense of self, distinct from societal expectations. the fact that a woman can defy societal pressures without changing her gender identity, and a man enjoying makeup doesn't alter his gender, underscores the difference between gender expression and identity. your analogy to white supremacists, porn addicts, and religious people is so fallacious, legitimate gender research is grounded in intrepretivist paradigms science, not faith or pseudoscience

Not at all. And about the manga, I read it by curiosity and formed my own opinions. And you're the one who was rude because I don't believe and adhere to rethorics based on porn

Words salad and did you copy past your comment from Ai or what?
Anyone can see through the bs you're spewing.
A man enjoying "feminine" stuff doesn't make him a woman. You don't even know what you're talking about.
There is no need to turn and rely on a circular logic and philosophical bullshit because you can't accept the reality and importance of biological sex.

Well, if I were a porn addict, white supremacist, incel or cruel doctor who wants to make easy money, I will use easily vulnerable children and adults who can't accept their same sex attraction and disgusting incels appropriating womanhood, by butchering them and making huge profits.
Thankfully, I am not.
I don't even know what you're trying to do by parroting the same bs ╮(￣▽￣)╭

does your 'thought formation' rationale camouflage disingenuous intellectualisation of trans lives ? do parasitic readings, absent empathetic consideration, constitute scholarly engagement or ethical dereliction?

this reminds me of the same recycled playbook used against every marginalized group in history:call them dangerous, accuse them of being notorious, claim they’re victims of “manupulation,” then profit off the fear. it was used against gay people during mccarthyism, against women seeking autonomy, and now against trans people. none of that is original and authentic. it’s just prejudice masqueraded up as concern. if your argument relies on demonizing people instead of engaging with evidence, it’s not a discrepancy at all.

claiming you “read it out of curiosity” doesn’t change the fact that your argument simplu boils down to reducing trans existence to porn tropes. it’s intellectually bankrupt. if you can’t discuss trans issues without filtering them through pornography, the problem isn’t with trans people, it’s with the lens you’ve chosen to look through.

resorting to calling an altercation “word salad” isn’t a rebuttal, it’s a blatant avoidance. my point was clear: gender identity and gender expression are completely SEGREGATED, and collapsing them into “men liking feminine things” is an oversimplification that litr ignores decades of medical research. bio sex itself is not binary but a spectrum, shaped by chromosomes, hormones, and anatomy, and recognized as such in contemporary science. gender identity is about how people experience and understand themselves , it is not circular logic as you claim it, it’s documented, studied, and supported by every medical studies out there. you're comparing evidence-based research to faith which just shows you don’t have a counterargument. if you had one, you’d engage with the evidence instead of labelling it as pseudoscience or dehumanizing trans people by persistently referring to them as porn rhetoric

Bio sex is binary and I know about the parasites and leeches bringing intersex people into the conversations.
You embody "the lights are on but nobody is home" idiom.
Right. Those medical "studies"and organizations making profits from vulnerable people, mostly kids and LGB people with internalized homophobia and objectified women, and of course, perverts like trans women invading women's spaces and calming womanhood because they want to dominate women.
Such brave doctors. It takes guts to openly showcase their greed and cruelty to step on women and LGB rights and butchering kids by turning into laboratory rats for profits.

You're explaining nothing.
You can't even define a woman and man without resorting to circular logic and sexist stereotypes.
Lots of people feel and experiences paranoid and schizophrenic moments, it doesn't mean we should validate their mental illness.
Except those suffering from unaddressed mental health issues and need our help, the rest are perverts, straight people and a few LGB people with internalized homophobia and sexism

Yes, utter bs. And I don't see trans people through porn which ironic considering the fact that most of them are porn consumers.

Ah yes, because me not validating their fetishes is such a dehumanizing act. No different than incels and homophobes.
You're not worth my time and you can blabber as much as you want to. I don't support tq+

@/Jieun this strikes me as a classic pulling data out of an unwashed ass rhetoric. The available evidence actually indicates that men constitute the largest demographic of pornography consumers.

Whatever makes you porn addicts sleep at night and trans women are men