The brother plot was a wasted opportunity. What u did in ur previous life shouldn't determ...

like theres a whole segment about the eunuch experiencing psychological torgure bc he experiences several different lives while keeping his past memories. its like experiencing immortality, building a new life wtih new people, only for it to be taken from u by death, experiencing it over and over again. the reason its so agonizing for him is because he retains those emotions, thoughts, memories, consciousness, and basically everything that makes you, you. its because he remains the same person in a different body that makes it so debilitating

just because he repents, doesnt mean he should automatically be forgiven thats for the mc to decide and he made a very clear decison and boundary that he is not forgiven and that is VALID. if someone had traumatized u as a kid and it completely changed ur life, ur allowed to not forgive them as an adult even if they sincerely apologize and repent because that is ur right as the person who was wronged. just bc they died and were reborn doesnt make them different people and that doesnt erase the pain and trouble caused. mc cutting things off is whats best for both of them.

I did reread, and I wasn't being aggressive, not once. How you misunderstood confuses me. If anything, you've been rude and aggressive in ALL your responses. (Is it possible you confused the all caps as aggressive? [If you didn't know, that's a common writing technique to emphasize certain phrases or words]). Well, I'm also not aware how you don't know this, but we’re different fucking people and different fucking people happen to comprehend things differently. I won't apologize for being aggressive or confused because, in the end, I wasn't aggressive, and being confused isn't something that anyone should apologize for. Your “main fucking point” wasn’t clear, what you believed yes, but how you supported it? No. You were way too out of context from the story and were taking things out of the narrative, so no, again, you weren't clear. I didn't understand how your points supported your claim and if you aren't helping your point, even now. I recommend taking some ELA classes. They help with creating followable evidence and commentary for your thesis.

Taking things out of narrative? please I took NOTHING lmfao show me where exactly I did any of the sort. I mentioned another piece of media where a similar concept was implemented and u immediately started being aggresive for some weird reason lol All I did was respect the author's choice but disagreed with their philosophy and take on it. You came in here telling me I'm somehow wrong for it. Why exactly I have no idea. Because again, this wasn't abt the structure of the story or characterization, it was an opinion abt reincarnation as a whole. So what the hell man. Also nice job insulting me when somehow other ppl could understand what I was saying but only you had an issue and that's somehow on me???? I had perfectly good examples and evidence. You started going on abt abusers and victims when I made a clear distinction. My main point was a "I don't equate past lives with current lives" statement. If you are confused after I repeat that very simple sentence 3 times then sorry but that's on you.

Just as you said you took another piece of media; that is quite literally out of narrative. I haven't been aggressive at all, despite what you've stated. In any case, a state where I've been aggressive since that seems to be something we can't agree on. Not once have I been rude. I've stated my opinion and why I believe your reasoning to be flawed, why is that wrong? To state your opinion? I believed this to just be a discussion between two points. YOU are the one who’s taking this too sensitively. Thank you for your acknowledgment of insulting you; it wasn't my intention but regardless, I didn't make it YOUR fault. If anything, it wasn't anyone’s fault. Not mine for not understanding, nor yours for not connecting your points. While I agree with “I don't equate past lives with current lives", this isn't a normal scenario. In the context of the story, the characters are painted as the same people throughout their incarnations with the same desires and thoughts. Much time has passed; character growth is clear. However, in the narrative, they are the same people as before, just with development. That is something you don't seem to comprehend. If the author had painted them as characters with simple memories of something of another life, I would agree with you full-heartedly. However, that isn't what’s happening, which is where the argument falls. Not arguing what-ifs, but staying within the context. Therefore, the reason I talked about abusers and victims is because that's what's occurring. That is the way the characters are constructed; I'm simply staying in the narrative.

And you still don't get it even after repeating it 30 damn times. Sure I used a different media bc u clearly couldn't understand my example so I tried paint a clearer view. U still refused to listen. You are stating my reasoning for reincarnation is flawed as if it's my whim and not an actual "teaching" let's call it lol There are two views on reincarnation, neither is wrong or flawed. You are basically acting as if I'm factually wrong when I'm not.

clicked post accidentally. To add on what I wrote. I am. perfectly well what the author did and somehow U are under the impression I don't understand it lol I do. I just disagree with that interpretation of reincarnation that's it. i will say it one more time bc clearly you constantly try to miss the point. I understand perfectly well what the author did and I disagree. is that simple enough for you or are U gonna try to explain the story to me one more time lol

Okay, as I was saying you didn't state it “30 times” only a few. I understand your claim. That is clear, and I’ve said this before, what I don't understand is your evidence and support. You are not the one understanding now. I understand your claim, but not your evidence. I wanted clarity on your EVIDENCE. I'm not saying your claim is wrong. I'm saying the way you support it is wrong. I've stated already that I agree with your “past lives don't equate current lives” or something like that statement; I've stated it “30 times” (obviously less) when its outside of the narrative. Do I need to state it again? I understand your claim. I don't understand your evidence. Therefore your point is flawed because it's supported incorrectly. I understand you comprehend the author. Never did I make that assumption, so listen carefully. If you take notice, rarely do I repeat the same context, when you don't understand MY POINTS (not the authors) is when I repeat statements. You keep talking about how I don't understand your points, but what I've been arguing is against your evidence and commentary, not your claim.

What a pointless discussion lol What evidence was wrong? I'm basing my claims on the philosophical idea itself. You keep saying I'm wrong and basing it on the story. You are misunderstanding me on a fundamental level. Coming in here claiming my idea of LIFE is basically wrong bc of what exactly??? Don't bother responding, not interested in someone acting dumb and arguing just to insult me further.

I’ve been arguing that you've been using the wrong evidence. Frankly, I don't care about anything you've been saying on the discussion because all you've been doing is taking this sensitively when all I want to do is understand your evidence, but I agree this was a stupid discussion with someone who won't open their mind to see the points of the opposition. I've not been acting dumb, I've been genuinely confused. If that's so hard to understand, respectfully, you aren't worth the time any longer.

whether u agree or disagree with how the story ended, u literally cannot refuse the fact that he is the same person from his previous incarnations bc that os literally how the story was written and why it ended the way it did. it is not up for philosophical interpretation like how ur doing. if the brother had not regained his memories/never retained his memories, the whole brother subplot would mean literally nothing and would fall even more flat with trauma and feelings left unresolved. if thats the kind of ending u wanted, thats fine, but u cannot deny that in this story, u r the same person even through reincarnation if u retain ur memories