This is so ironic, did you even read what I replied before you copied and pasted your own reply?
Yes, I agree with you there's a lot more wild manga. I myself have read them, I've read a lot of filth myself tbh. Some a thousand times worse than this. I'm just a little tired of misogyny in some bl so I brought up this point. It wasn't even meant to be a big deal, just a pattern I found. What I find surprising is that there are antis who read this manga and are arguing with my point like I'm making a personal attack against them like??? What are they doing at the devil's sacrament you know?
And anyways I have nothing against the author. I'll still enjoy the manga, I just spoke about a little something I was uncomfortable about.
Once again if you’re not happy with how the law work go take it out with the police because what ml did to the guys is considered rape. Now stop bothering me and talking out of your ass about how YOU think rape is. (And btw the law is more important and legit then a definition on google)
You just can't accept you're wrong can you? Wtf do you mean "Now stop bothering me and talking out of your ass about how YOU think rape is"??? Are you fucking serious? Do you bend reality to fit your views or some shit? I never once "talked out of my ass", YOU DID. You made up your own definition, I never did. Also "And btw the law is more important and legit then a definition on google"? And there are LEGAL FIRMS on the internet telling everyone the definition and also you completely ignored the very real LEGAL case that I presented to you that proved the complete opposite of your point.
Stop acting like I'm the one who's been all up in your business when you're the one who keeps coming back over and over again to comment on my post. Seriously, you're wrong. That's okay. Live and learn. You don't want to be the type of person who is so stubborn that you can't see out of your own ass. Learn a little humility
You provide a case that was COMPLETELY different and had nothing to do with the original scenario. And the fact that you can’t even understand that tell me everything I need to know about you the man got raped and that all. You’re the one who can’t accept the fact that putting ANYTHING in someone genital is rape and that’s you’re problem not mine so yeah stfu. If you want a real life case too I can also give you one then look up the Théo Luhaka case. They were in court for RAPE after they arrested him and forcibly inserted a baton in his butt when he showed resistance
Oml I thought you were done with this shit but here you are, bothering me with your delusional takes again. Are you sure you want this to end or do you just enjoy arguing with people on the internet? Let me address every single point you make:
1. "You provide a case that was COMPLETELY different and had nothing to do with the original scenario."
No, it was not completely different, and it did have something to do with original scenario. The original scenario was a case where the ML put an inanimate object up another person's genitals without their consent. The case also included someone putting an inanimate object up another person's genitals without their consent. And before you make some shitty take about how water isn't an 'object', it is. Look it up.
2. "And the fact that you can’t even understand that tell me everything I need to know about you the man got raped and that all. You’re the one who can’t accept the fact that putting ANYTHING in someone genital is rape and that’s you’re problem not mine so yeah stfu."
Except it just isn't. I don't know how many times I need to say it. It isn't automatically rape. The case that you're so intent on ignoring is basically the same as this one, except with a different object, and the man didn't kill him on purpose. No matter how many times you try and deny the legal and dictionary definition, that's just the plain truth.
3. "If you want a real life case too I can also give you one then look up the Théo Luhaka case. They were in court for RAPE after they arrested him and forcibly inserted a baton in his butt when he showed resistance"
Did you even read about the case or did you just frantically spend a day looking for any possible cases to try and debunk what I said? First of all, I didn't say that forcibly putting an object in a person's genitals NEVER counted as rape. I said that NOT ALL OF IT was considered rape. Obviously verdicts differ case by case. So yours is an utterly moot point.
And sure, I'll entertain you with the case: it's so sad that you tried to use this case to try and prove your point, and yet, THE CHARGE WAS CHANGED INTO VOLUNTARY VIOLENCE, NOT RAPE. Look up the Guardian article about it. Even the LAW disagrees with you.
Oml I thought you were done with this shit but here you are, bothering me with your delusional takes again. Are you sure you want this to end or do you just enjoy arguing with people on the internet? Let me address every single point you make:
1. "You provide a case that was COMPLETELY different and had nothing to do with the original scenario."
No, it was not completely different, and it did have something to do with original scenario. The original scenario was a case where the ML put an inanimate object up another person's genitals without their consent. The case also included someone putting an inanimate object up another person's genitals without their consent. And before you make some shitty take about how water isn't an 'object', it is. Look it up.
2. "And the fact that you can’t even understand that tell me everything I need to know about you the man got raped and that all. You’re the one who can’t accept the fact that putting ANYTHING in someone genital is rape and that’s you’re problem not mine so yeah stfu."
Except it just isn't. I don't know how many times I need to say it. It isn't automatically rape. The case that you're so intent on ignoring is basically the same as this one, except with a different object, and the man didn't kill him on purpose. No matter how many times you try and deny the legal and dictionary definition, that's just the plain truth.
Jesus I can't even reply the second part of it
3. "If you want a real life case too I can also give you one then look up the The0 Luhaka case. They were in court for R4PE after they arrested him and forcibly inserted a baton in his butt when he showed resistance"
Did you even read about the case or did you just frantically spend a day looking for any possible cases to try and debunk what I said? First of all, I didn't say that forcibly putting an object in a person's genitals NEVER counted as r4pe. I said that NOT ALL OF IT was considered r4pe. Obviously verdicts differ case by case. So yours is an utterly moot point.
Jesus I can't even reply the second part of it.
For the part about Theo:
Did you even read about the case or did you just frantically spend a day looking for any possible cases to try and debunk what I said? First of all, I didn't say that forcibly putting an object in a person's genitals NEVER counted as rape. I said that NOT ALL OF IT was considered rape. Obviously verdicts differ case by case. So yours is an utterly moot point.
And sure, I'll entertain you with the case: it's so sad that you tried to use this case to try and prove your point, and yet, THE CHARGE WAS CHANGED INTO VOLUNTARY VIOLENCE, NOT RAPE. Look up the Guardian article about it. Even the LAW disagrees with you.
I need you guys to stop fighting and hug each other out a slasher manga should not cause this much uproar for 3 pages please amend guys
Tbh I didn't even mean for this to be a big deal but they're arguing with me like I made a personal attack against them like I'm just giving them facts and they act like I'm trying to spread false news when I'm just giving them dictionary and legal definition of a word
That's definitely not the reason why they're arguing with you lol XD
The reason is because they said it was rape, I said it wasn't. I provided the dictionary and legal definition of rape, which didn't fit what was happening, and they denied it and acted like I was telling lies and making up definitions when they were the ones making up a definition that fit whatever fit their argument. Is this not the case?
Oh and did you notice? After I gave them the legal and dictionary definition, they got SUPER defensive and started calling me a dumbass and a bitch, saying that I was being passive aggressive "when they didn't say anything wrong" which is just false because they gave the wrong definition for rape and how was I being passive aggressive? Giving them the actual definition when they made one up, saying rape has nothing to do with sex when it's a major part of it? And them saying that Google is unreliable but oh this random stranger who's on the internet is supposedly more reliable to define a word than the world's largest search engine?
The revenges are satisfying but tbh I don't like how the male characters get a normal death but both the female characters also got raped before they died. I get that their death is related to how they acted before but the first guy was perverted and only got bashed in the head