if u have evidence i would love to see it
Yet you still won’t answer the question.. why read and defend it, if you are not attracted to children? Call it whatever you want. It’s still csam because it depicts the sexual abuse of a child, even if the child is fictional. It literally does not matter, it is still classified as child sexual assault material and it should be.
Again, there is enough research done on this topic. Fictional childporn/csam is also harmful. Not only is it harmful for survivors but it also does change and solidify your preferences, because you are literally seeing children in a sexual context for entertainment. This content is made for pedophiles by pedophiles, and you are very obviously one of them, otherwise you would not be wasting your time trying so desperately to defend it. Get help.
yall annoying asf u literally saw the cover and the tags so idk what u expected If u dont like it just dont read and move on