By this logic no food providor should give out food because without a signed disclosure they’d be liable for any food related incident caused by their food including possible death like medicine . Legit crazy .
They literally are, that’s how the food industry works. It’s why there are health inspections and such. If you die from the food because it was proved to be the cause of death bc it was prepared wrong you can sue the provider. When food (especially meat) has sat at for a while it’s becomes inedible. Companies don’t want to get sued. It’s literally the Dunkin Donuts incident. I did not make this logic up it is straight up how the food industry works dude.
IN OUR SOCIETY THEY HAVE A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT WORLD AND ARENT A COMPANY BUT THE GIVERNMENT
And you’re screaming… because? Just because you didn’t know how it works in reality written by an author from reality doesn’t mean we gotta throw a fit.
I wrote in caps to emphasize not to indicate screaming didn’t know that we could hear my voice through a screen like that
No need to emphasize that you’re a doofus.
I’m just gonna ignore people who think we shouldn’t feed people
Bro clearly didn’t read my first message in full and had a wittle meltdown
The reason why excess food isn’t given to the poor is because if the poor die because of the food the provider doesn’t want to liable. If you’re dying of starvation you’re not feeling disrespect, you’re feeling not dead.