youre missing the mark here by tenfold, this manga is not even trying to educate you against pdf, grooming or weird age gap, its not educating you with the taboo topic and making u want to think critically, it does not f cki ng do that, it is BOLDLY PRESENTING ITSELF VERY SHAMELESSLY AS LITERALLY A ROMANCE BL BETWEEN A PREPUBESCENT AND AN OLDER GUY who atp should have world views and awareness about the boundaries they shouldn't cross when interacting with a kid who is infatuated with them. Also who gives a fuck if youre an english major.
people thinks a well articulated sentence is also correct and sound is wild to me. Sure don't ban media that is borderline and questionable, isn't that why murder in fiction don't get called out for inciting violence cause it just doesn't. But good fuck all this yap fest just to say "don't ban this its lgbtq representation and its harmful to fhe community" is so fckinf stupid, i tell u, if somebody i know irl have this kind of relations with a kid and is a member of the community, which mind u i also belong with, i will fcking fck with them so so bad they wont hear the end of it degeneracy is just degeneracy, its not something poetic
YOU HAVE USAGI DROP AND SUPER LOVERS AND A BUNCH OF PORN MANGAS IN YOUR WANTING TO READ, idc if u have not read them yet u fuck, you are in no way fit to say any of this excuses bullcrap youre spewinf rn qnd your pfp is LITERALLY INCEST OF MARIBEL WHO IS LITERALLY 15 YEARS OLD AND HER FUCKINF UNCLE WHOS 50. Incest, pdf and a possible proshipper, or youre probably js dump which makes you both unfit to give out any "virtous" opinion
you should sht th fck up u are sick and there is nothing noble, critically challenging and therapeutic about what you consume, your opinion does not matter at all you are a very disturbed individual
As an artist and a writer I started studying media ethics because personally I do not believe anyone should be arrested based on the art they make or enjoy. This all started when I made a post that was supposed to be platonic but people mistook for a romantic ship. I didn't even like the ship but because of so much hate for something so minuscule I delved deeper into the discourse between anti and pro shippers. I do side with proshippers. In my personal experience they're a lot more chill and actually nice.
I've seen antis bully and dox a sixteen year old for drawing a fictional minor shirtless. For a group of people who say they're protecting children harassing and doxxing minors is the opposite of what you're supposed to be doing.
Yeah, if Im going to be studying media ethics I'm gonna have to get out of my own comfort zone and read taboo subjects and analyze them. Not just the material itself but the people who enjoy them. So far I don't see significant enough evidence that taboo content will make people harm others. I don't doubt that pedos would be drawn to this type of stuff but I don't think we should generalize. Most shotacons and lolicons i know are afab and on the ace spectrum not the basement dweller mods I first assumed. But then again that could be because of the certain fandoms I've been immersed with.
You have every right to be disturbed, upset, and disgusted by taboo content. It just shouldn't be met with "you should be put in jail for writing this". That is fascist ideology.
You're really immature. It's not an 'opinion', licensed professionals have confirmed time and time again you quite literally cannot develop paraphilic disorders through fiction alone unless there's an underlying issue.
If we banned icky fiction, predators won't suddenly decrease.
Also shame, regardless of ur intent, is harmful. Why? Because predators will simply learn to hide it better. Because they do not wait for Kindle Unlimited to drop, but to stumble across a vulnerable person. You are not a good person for spreading moral panic, blurring the lines between fiction and reality so heavily is concerning
Saying 'you're opinion doesn't matter, you're clearly a disturbed individual,' won't make you right
i dont give a fuck about ur supposed " licensed professionals" backing ur arguement on why i should be ok with you liking shotacon, and the other bitchass liking the ship between mirabel and bruno enough that they felt comfortable using their kissing art for pfp, you can yap all you want i do not give a fuck, degenerates are degenerates, all this essay is not making you a "deep learned" individual, its literally js fucking excuses
i dont give a fuck about ur supposed " licensed professionals" backing ur arguement on why i should be ok with you liking shotacon, and the other bitchass liking the ship between mirabel and bruno enough that they felt comfortable using their kissing art for pfp, you can yap all you want i do not give a fuck, degenerates are degenerates, all this essay is not making you a "deep learned" individual, its literally js fucking excuses
ah wait, since u all like the word essays here
Your paragraphs are long, your words are big, and your citations of “licensed professionals” are very impressive. But let me be extremely clear: I do not give a single fuck.
You can craft the most pristine essay defending your comfort with shotacon, or the fact that you’re repping incest ship art like Mirabel x Bruno as your profile picture. You can call it “coping,” “fictional,” or “nuanced.” You can even drop names of psychologists or theories to pretend this makes you some kind of thoughtful media critic. But it doesn’t.
At the end of the day, all your eloquence boils down to one thing: an attempt to intellectualize degeneracy.
You’re not misunderstood. You’re not deep. You’re not operating on some higher level of media literacy. You’re just very loudly trying to justify something that most people find disturbing — and no, writing it in MLA format doesn’t change that.
So keep yapping in your little essays if you want. Just know that not everyone’s going to clap politely and nod along while you try to sanitize the unsanitary. Some of us are going to call it what it is — because no amount of “but it’s fiction!” is going to make it not weird. You can try to dress it up, but rot is rot.
Giving a damn only when the fucked up media is actually fuckinf done by the one consuming it in real life is police behaviour. You nip it in the bud.
Saying their opinion doesn't matter and they're a clearly disturbed individual is subjectively right, "Saying im not right won't make you right" either
Obviously but logically you're wrong. You do not care for victims, you do not care about survivors unless they fit the 'perfect victim' mold, you just want to look morally superior
'Subjective' is more objective. You don't know them personally and they had points based on facts and psychological research, you can't declare them as 'disturbed' when you know you're in the wrong
Hello, English major here doing research on anti censorship. You can feel uncomfortable with the content of this story. You're supposed to! But we shouldn't ban media based off of morals because its a slipper slope. It can lead to LGBT+ media getting banned because its against someone else's morals. We've seen this decline before with conservatism with Nazis and how they censored based on blasphemy and Obscenity. Which are all subjective. Besides proof that taboo fiction is used as therapeutic, just because it is romanticizing in fiction does not mean it is being endorsed.
I beg you to read the material itself and try to find other aspects that could be the "appeal" of such stories. It's more than just "oh i like kids".