Mini-Review: Just as good as part 1

ReviewRaptor May 27, 2025 10:44 am

Definetly a worthy follow up to the first story, love it.
I can tell the author is either not comfortable or not too creative in the smut department, hence the bonking scene was a bit bland in terms of uncreative angles being used or sensuality being portrayed in detail, but that is about the only issue I can find here. Well, I would have prefered seeing the MC go to a hospital to check his head, but oh well. XD

Yet again another sweet romance with an interesting story attached to it. I really like it.
Worth reading, tho I think it's a must to read the first comic before this. Otherwise it might feel more bland since you don't get to know the characters and all that.

Give it a go, not a must read but certainly not a waste of time if you're looking for something simple and sweet with a nice storyline.

Responses
    Emy May 27, 2025 9:48 am

    I get what you mean but at the same time love stories don't always have to be just based around smut like that, I saw it as a heartwarming intimate moment between them and I feel that is okay. (no hate)

    ReviewRaptor May 27, 2025 10:10 am
    I get what you mean but at the same time love stories don't always have to be just based around smut like that, I saw it as a heartwarming intimate moment between them and I feel that is okay. (no hate) Emy

    What I mean by bland is the positions, angles and such just not having anything special to it. Which makes it obvious the artist is either not too skilled in those things or they don't quite care for portraying those scenes in detail.

    I don't care much for smut but if sexual scenes are implemented, they should at least have something to the art if the artist depicts them doing it.

    (I'm personally not interested in smut scenes and don't require them in a comic. I'm purely speaking on technical things and art stuff here.)

    Emy May 27, 2025 10:20 am
    What I mean by bland is the positions, angles and such just not having anything special to it. Which makes it obvious the artist is either not too skilled in those things or they don't quite care for portraying... ReviewRaptor

    ah, okay, I understand what you mean. I'm sorry for the misunderstanding of your comment.

    ReviewRaptor May 27, 2025 10:45 am
    ah, okay, I understand what you mean. I'm sorry for the misunderstanding of your comment. Emy

    Oh, no worries! That's normal, happens to us all sometimes. And I know sometimes I don't describe things as detailed as I could/should. ( ̄∇ ̄")

    I'll edit my post a bit to make sure to point towards it being about the creativity of things, not just detailed fap material not being there. I can see how that can be misunderstood. XD