i understand ur pov, but still they could have chosen a different punishment. he was still useful in that tiny society of their.
Sorry to burst your bubble but they literally blindfolded everyone when they arrived to the village, they did the same to teach and guwan said it was a mandatory thing. So they literally could've blindfolded the old guy, driven him far and then dumped him somewhere else. Bro still wouldn't know where the village is. That's just not an excuse
okay. question to everyone. what punishment would be best? one that wouldn’t breed resentment, but would be harsh enough to deter others from committing the same crime in the future,
A quick death, gun shot wound straight to the head, how is this being debated?!
Also my previous reply would probably also be the most humane. In my opinion.
i think that’s fair. would i go so far as to saying that’s not an excuse? no. because everyone knew what the punishment was, from the chapter it was clear that everyone understood what would happen at and after the trial. again, if i’m putting my life on the line, life or death, in maintaining a safe society… i’m not taking ANY chances for someone to put that in jeopardy. blindfolds definitely lessen that chance significantly, but don’t eliminate it entirely.
Well now I know what side your are on in the apocalypse
Nah dude death as punishment??? That’s going too far. Punishment should definitely b in order. Something serious like imprisonment, no food no water for like 3 days. That should be good enough
they’re living in an apocalypse…for me, i’m not wasting a good bullet or the life of a gun on a rule breaker. every. single. thing they use is precious. to meet you halfway though they could’ve used a knife to slit his throat. but part of me wonders where the beating idea started…. idk just me.
no food or water for 3 days… that’s it??? i would steal the medicine 10 times over. light work
If you really want to preserve resources, just blindfold him and drop him off somewhere bruh, and you've also got a knife like you said. Why we still discussing this when you know what's morally right and just.
duh….? did you not read my original post or what.
bruh, you commented on MY post about MY opinion. if you don’t agree with me that’s cool. but then go away? smh
Yeah, you said you'd rather not take any risks. Implying you'd probably find yourself in a point where you feel the need to do the bad for the good. Degrading your mentality further until there is no moral judgment. I've read my post apocalyptic books, I know how these things go. It's not bad but it sure is ignorant
Why are being so angry, I'm literally just answering you cause you keep replying
i’m not “being angry” i’m literally just stating what i think. and if you think differently like i said, cool. but why are you being arrogant? saying things such as “when you know what is morally right and just” as if i’m supposed to automatically agree with you. people react differently to different situations. which is again, why i said, i’ll just off myself because it’s not worth having to deal with situations like the one we’re discussing. and i’m replying because AGAIN, it’s my post.
I would suggest that the father now has to become a ‘hound’ and now has to replace the medicine that he stole. Or, find something of equal or greater value. And he would have no privileges until he fulfilled his duty.
Of course, I’d also blindfold him before sending him out because he’s proven to be untrustworthy.
There’s still a risk with this, of him running away and trying to come back with people to get his son. It wouldn’t matter if he didn’t know the exact location. Just the rumor of a place like this existing is a MAJOR threat.
Another negative is that it would take away time and energy guarding him etc. that could be spent elsewhere.
and i’ve minored in psychology, does that make me an experiment on human behavior? no. neither does you reading works of fiction (〜￣△￣)〜
Yeah if you make a post expect replies, that's just media in general. Also I wasn't trying to be rude, if you go back I'm just being more factual replying to your replies. I like to say that EVERYONE at least has some moral judgment which is why I said you would know what is just and right. Unless you're mentally challenged which I hope your not. Anyways I've already moved on, I'm not dissing you about your opinion I'm just being factual from what's given to us
Psychoanalyst here buddy lol
this is a good suggestion though, but yeah it is a HUGE risk, and taking away that time and energy that could be spent elsewhere is crucial. it would be a coin toss for sure
these comments are why if there was ever an end of the world apocalypse i’m just offing myself.
“why couldn’t they just banish him” “it’s just medicine for his son”. bruh. society has literally crumbled.
they can’t produce more medicine. and if they can, those supplies are very very limited because the people who actually go out and get the supplies need first dibs on said medicine to be able to go out and get supplies! and they live in a secret haven separated from hell outside. the goal is no one should know this place even exists.
yall need to pull off the rose colored glasses cause like i said, if any of you actually said this shit in real life under very real life apocalyptic standards, i’d lose my ever loving mind.
have fun downvoting me.