yeah yall are crazy

A bullet in a zombie apocalypse is worth more than gold.
And if you’re judging by morality. There is no ‘humane’ way to execute someone because the act itself is inhumane.

then why talk about you reading works of fiction?? that’s just a weird way to assert your knowledge

okokok it depends on the crime, but death by getting BEAT by a bat??? TWD style??? You’d vote for that??? One thing’s for sure, I’m staying the hell away from society if there was an apocalypse. Lmao I rather die than live to turn into a monster

okay. i went back to your comments, but you didn’t. the very first thing you said was “sorry to burst your bubble” you’re a psychoanalyst. what do you think when someone starts a sentence off in that way. then you go on to say “how is this being debated ” which is ironic to you saying if i post then i should expect replies… then you lovely put in how i’m ignorant. so. what now?

yeah a bat is pretty brutal i confess, like i said ill just off myself before it even gets to that point ╮(￣▽￣)╭

If you go to my bio, I like to add my skill in reading, also since I'm reading I'm also just being a reader lol, but why be offended, what offended you?

Same... I'd just live in seclusion and migrate if I saw a group enter my terf

i legit just told you. with examples. here’s an fyi though. you can’t off the rip be rude, then back down by saying “i wasn’t being rude” after doing rude stuff, then go “what offended you” after i laid out exactly what you did, the gaslighting is peak.

Dude, in this thread alone you’ve implied that people that don’t agree with you lack moral judgment, are ignorant, and mentally challenged.
I think you need to relearn what constitutes ‘dissing’ someone.

I'm pretty sure if you know what the moral right and choose to ignore it for self interest, it IS being ignorant. The moral right would be to just blindfold him and leave him somewhere far away for the maggots to deal with. Far enough they wouldn't know where to go and Like others have said, there are better ways than just bludgening someone to death lol like using a knife. How is that being rude?

Also you took my words out of context I never implied anyone was mentally challenged I said I hoped your weren't mentally challenged, cause that's a bad place to be in lol, been there before. And I'm still being factual in my responses?

Call it gaslighting if you want but when hit with facts and reason people tend to feel offended

you’re missing the whole point. and at this stage there is no way you’re a psychoanalyst because if you were you would know that the basis of morality has footholds in both relativity and universalism depending on a myriad of factors. even if you were to argue that the do no harm portion of it is strong, to imply that it’s higher than situation based moral implications is strongly biased and not factual in the slightest. furthermore, to desgods point, i fear that you not seeing your words, the ones i quoted from you, were not rude is… a problem in and of itself.

Well I did say to ignore your moral judgment is ignorant but I also said it wasn't bad, if you go back to my reply it's says there. I say it wasn't bad because everyone has an experience that shapes them to be what they are. It's true that by ignoring your morality you decend further down which is why I'm pressing the issue that morality is important in these situations. No one can say "if the circumstances were this way..." you need to have a moral judgment when the apocalypse comes, it keeps your humanity which is extremely important on a universal scale affecting not only you but your decisions, actions, and peers. Your outlook, I wasn't dissing you in the beginning, I was simply telling you that despite all avenues, there are better ways of handling such situations.

Sorry I can’t debate you if you don’t know the meaning of ‘mentally challenged’, ‘imply’, and the difference between facts and opinions.
Lastly, the basic fact the morality is highly subjective and nuanced.

Enforcing such brutality will instead cause distrust, fear, and rash unpredictable decision making

I'm not gonna try and reason with you if you're just gonna take my words out of context and not look deeper into what I'm trying to say. So agree to disagree

“it’s true that ignoring your morality you descend further down”. no it’s not. all those words are completely subjective. you would first have to define each persons morality and what that means to them, and you would also need to define what “further down” means by their OWN perception, not yours. on top of that would need to define the actions of ignoring. again. none of this is factual in the slightest. you’re taking your own world view and assuming it as the basis of everyone else’s. this is how i know you’re not a psychoanalyst, because they literally teach this in psych 101 and as a “psychoanalyst”… that’s your whole job??? “better ways of handling it” again subjective. i told you through all the comments that you can believe what you believe and so can i point blank. even the concept on what humanity is, extremely nuanced. the whole concept on morality that again, basic psych, it can change. so yeah, i’m done commenting because on top of failing to see your rude comments, you are legitimately exercising bad faith bias from the jump. something a real psychoanalyst would never do.

After reading my responses I can conclude I wasn't being as rude as you guys thought. As a reader I was sharing my opinion while expressing said opinion lol, crazy how quick it went quiet tho ╮(￣▽￣)╭

Okay, legit question.
Are you ESL(English second language)? Because you’re literally using MANY words you obviously don’t know the meaning of.
I’m not trying to insult you.
I’m genuinely trying to help you for the future. You’re misusing and misunderstanding a lot of the terms/concepts you’re using.