I'm sorry the teach is PMO so bad, bro you're deaduzz in a zombie apocalypse wdym ur nawt ...

Damn, that’s a lot of yap for ‘I’m mad you disagreed with me and understood my argument better than I did.’ You keep swinging between ‘I’m not justifying it’??? and then fully justifying it with ‘desperate times’ like that magically erases human cost, and you tell me I'm contradicting?? Hellaur??

You toss out ‘objective morality’ like it’s some cheat ass code, but all you’re doing is clinging to rules as if they’re UNTOUCHABLE commandments . Rules built from fear aren’t SACRED DAWG they’re just fear but in shit writing. And let’s be real: your whole trolley problem analogy flopped the very MOEMNT you acted like empathy is some naive luxury instead of a survival strategy rooted in community strength

You say I avoid your points?? Dawg no, I’m dismantling them for YOU. If your logic ends with a child dying to keep a rulebook intact,your ‘objective morality’ is just cruelty in a fancy hat. Compassion ISa risk, but thenso is apathy?? The difference is, one leads to people fighting for each other. The other turns villages into execution pits, because what? They're WORTH MORE? What exactly is that??

So you can keep projecting and calling it philosophy, but at the end of the day, you’re just mad someone dared to humanize survival. And if that bothers you, maybe it’s not me who needs to put feelings in a bag i’s you who forgot where you left your humanity, big EW

This is actually mad frustrating af, you keep flip-flopping between ‘I’m just trying to understand empathy’ and straight up calling it naive and dangerous?? Which is it? Don’t gaslight me dawg

You say I justified risking medicine for a kid? No. I said a community that protects ALL its people, and Thst includes the vulnerable. That doesn’t mean throwing resources around blindly, It means recognizing that survival is more than just numbers; it’s about building a future worth surviving. Like that's really it, there's no need for bat shit crazy like public execution, because at the end of the day it's not like he's domes such an evil act??? If the village is meant to protect, why is it's resources being withheld from it's PPL? Such as the dad here??

You want to talk logistics? Fine. Saving a child may not bring INSTANT food or resources, but neither does creating fear by publicly killing a man who broke a rule out of love and care for his own fucking child. That kind of leadership breeds silence, resentment, and even it's collapse. Communities thrive when people believe they’re worth protecting, not just when they’re ‘useful'. And that's why you sound absolutely batshit crazy for what you have uttered these past replies.

So don’t twist my words like I’m saying emotion > logic, because what iam saying is logic without empathy isn’t strength, itss cruelty. And if you ACTUALLY wanted to understand that, maybe try listening instead of calling names. Stop acting as if viewing the world in such a way would save you.

Listen here

You keep demanding "objective reasoning" like survival is some math equation shit, but you're missing the bigger picture, people don't fight for cold rules,they fight for each other. No, the sick boy doesn't magically save the scalpers like some fucking god wizard with healing and creation powers, but killing a man for trying to save his kid sends a message that rules matter more than people, and that destroys trust, morale, and the will to protect ANYONE, that’s not pragmatism anymore, itds rot disguised as order.

If you really think a child has to earn the right to live by being useful, then you’re not talking about survival anymore, you’re talking about dehumanization. And if your version of a functioning village needs to sacrifice compassion to stay alive, maybe it doesn’t deserve to survive in the first place.

And you know what, that speaks a lot about who you are. Seriously.