I'm sorry the teach is PMO so bad, bro you're deaduzz in a zombie apocalypse wdym ur nawt ...

Damn, that’s a lot of yap for ‘I’m mad you disagreed with me and understood my argument better than I did.’ You keep swinging between ‘I’m not justifying it’??? and then fully justifying it with ‘desperate times’ like that magically erases human cost, and you tell me I'm contradicting?? Hellaur??

You toss out ‘objective morality’ like it’s some cheat ass code, but all you’re doing is clinging to rules as if they’re UNTOUCHABLE commandments . Rules built from fear aren’t SACRED DAWG they’re just fear but in shit writing. And let’s be real: your whole trolley problem analogy flopped the very MOEMNT you acted like empathy is some naive luxury instead of a survival strategy rooted in community strength

You say I avoid your points?? Dawg no, I’m dismantling them for YOU. If your logic ends with a child dying to keep a rulebook intact,your ‘objective morality’ is just cruelty in a fancy hat. Compassion ISa risk, but thenso is apathy?? The difference is, one leads to people fighting for each other. The other turns villages into execution pits, because what? They're WORTH MORE? What exactly is that??

So you can keep projecting and calling it philosophy, but at the end of the day, you’re just mad someone dared to humanize survival. And if that bothers you, maybe it’s not me who needs to put feelings in a bag i’s you who forgot where you left your humanity, big EW

This is actually mad frustrating af, you keep flip-flopping between ‘I’m just trying to understand empathy’ and straight up calling it naive and dangerous?? Which is it? Don’t gaslight me dawg

You say I justified risking medicine for a kid? No. I said a community that protects ALL its people, and Thst includes the vulnerable. That doesn’t mean throwing resources around blindly, It means recognizing that survival is more than just numbers; it’s about building a future worth surviving. Like that's really it, there's no need for bat shit crazy like public execution, because at the end of the day it's not like he's domes such an evil act??? If the village is meant to protect, why is it's resources being withheld from it's PPL? Such as the dad here??

You want to talk logistics? Fine. Saving a child may not bring INSTANT food or resources, but neither does creating fear by publicly killing a man who broke a rule out of love and care for his own fucking child. That kind of leadership breeds silence, resentment, and even it's collapse. Communities thrive when people believe they’re worth protecting, not just when they’re ‘useful'. And that's why you sound absolutely batshit crazy for what you have uttered these past replies.

So don’t twist my words like I’m saying emotion > logic, because what iam saying is logic without empathy isn’t strength, itss cruelty. And if you ACTUALLY wanted to understand that, maybe try listening instead of calling names. Stop acting as if viewing the world in such a way would save you.

Listen here

You keep demanding "objective reasoning" like survival is some math equation shit, but you're missing the bigger picture, people don't fight for cold rules,they fight for each other. No, the sick boy doesn't magically save the scalpers like some fucking god wizard with healing and creation powers, but killing a man for trying to save his kid sends a message that rules matter more than people, and that destroys trust, morale, and the will to protect ANYONE, that’s not pragmatism anymore, itds rot disguised as order.

If you really think a child has to earn the right to live by being useful, then you’re not talking about survival anymore, you’re talking about dehumanization. And if your version of a functioning village needs to sacrifice compassion to stay alive, maybe it doesn’t deserve to survive in the first place.

And you know what, that speaks a lot about who you are. Seriously.

Let me just advise you on this. Don’t waste your time replying people that don’t get it. Your point of view is more than valid and you defended you argument very well. You tried. Really. But when you meet a wall just stop. Enjoy the ride and don’t waste anymore of your energy on people that lack a broad view, “critical thinking”,or that can’t navigate another prospective that does not sit well with them. ヾ(❀╹◡╹)ﾉ~

I agree with you on one thing. If a system only values people when they’re useful, it will rot from the inside. People need to feel protected and worth something beyond what they produce.

But that has to be balanced with the fact that survival depends on structure. The village didn’t create rules to punish love. It created rules to keep a limited supply of medicine from becoming a free-for-all.

Of course it’s painful. Of course it’s not fair. But survival isn’t about fairness. It’s about keeping the group alive. Everyone in that village has someone they love. The rules exist to protect as many people as possible, not just the ones who cry the loudest.

A child might represent the future, sure. But there’s no future if the present collapses. If the people risking their lives to protect and supply the village don’t survive, there won’t be anything left for that kid to grow up in.

That said, I’m not saying I agree with the death penalty. Personally, I think exile would’ve been a more humane punishment. Something that still held him accountable without making it irreversible. But I wasn’t there before. Neither was the MC. We don’t know what had to happen for the village to even reach this point.

The MC just arrived. He hasn’t earned the right to tear down a system he doesn’t understand. He’s reacting to one man’s pain without seeing the broader cost. Feeling something strongly doesn’t automatically make it right. And morality without context is just noise.

You’re right to warn about cruelty disguised as order. But we’re warning about chaos disguised as compassion.

Both can destroy a community. The only way forward is recognizing that empathy and rules have to work together, not compete.

Omg you've actually found the middle ground in this, the morality guy keeps yapping about black/white side of things and keeps justifying the father stealing limited medicine which risking the entire village.

I'm not saying the kid should just die, but the father need consequences for disobeying rules (rules for higher chance of survival) even if it's a for a good selfish cause, Rules are created for fairness safety and order, without it, it's just survival of the fittest.(AGAIN HUMANS ARE SELFISH BEINGS BY NATURE)

Talina gets me by "The MC just arrived. He hasn’t earned the right to tear down a system he doesn’t understand" that's why he PMO he doesn't have the standing for it if his morals are right/wrong(it's not black and white) he can't just act like that because bro just woke up from a coma and doesn't understand shit.

"SURVIVAL not fair. But survival isn’t about fairness. It’s about keeping the group alive" SEE IS IT THAT HARD TO UNDERSTAND, The village is unstable they need to prioritize the people who contributes to keep it alive.

"The village didn’t create rules to punish love. It created rules to keep a limited supply of medicine from becoming a free-for-all" SEE THEY GET IT, WAS IT THAT HARD WITHOUT PAINTING ME AS A VILLAIN BECAUSE OF YOUR STRONG EMPATHY? i agree empathy and compassion in a healthy community, but a surviving one? They all need to compromise that's all.

So let me get this straight—you admit the system is broken, that survival isn’t fair, that rules were made under pressure, and that the dad acted out of love… but still think executing him was the right call because he broke the rules???? That’s not balance at al that’s just cruelty wrapped in some policy

The MC didn’t need to “earn the right” to call out a shitty system because sometimes fresh eyes are the only ones not rotted by survival-mode apathy. Compassion isn't the problem here dawg, it's the blind obedience

You can clearly see how much dear this has upon other villagers. Face the consequences? By what? Executing home when there could have been a lot of alternatives? You sound so fucking disgusting

Yk talking to a wall would've been more progressive, than your shit ass attitude and your goody two-shoes mentality, the world isn't as kind as you think it is, even as u say they banished the father he's still a liability.

How ironic with how you stand with compassion and kindness, yet your attitude is dogshit, i get your empathetic yet you cant see it on other people perspective and see it in your rainbow coloured eyes, you're narrow minded.

It's a broken system in a broken world, Desperate times calls for desperate measure, survival isn't fair, Action=Consequences, AND YES IT'S NOT BALANCED WHY ARE U FINDING BALANCED IN A UNFAIR WORLD? (What more do you not understand?)

Again, you're full of contradiction, you won't and try to understand the perspective of others, and you have superiority complex with your righteousness.

This was a losing battle from the start smh. Eat shit.

You said the child didn’t “earn” the right to be saved—as if basic survival now needs to be deserved. That alone reveals how far gone your perspective is. A society that makes children prove their usefulness before being deemed worthy of medicine isn’t “survival,” it’s. That’s inhumane. And that is what you have been saying these past replies, insinuating even, that someone has to earn the right to live.

You're angry at the MC for reacting emotionally, but from his view??, a man was killed not for greed or betrayal, but for trying to save his dying son—wouldnt you react the same way? Because of course he’d question a system like that—especially as someone not yet desensitized by it. That isn’t moral superiority, it’s the most logical reaction from someone with an uncompromised perspective.

You say “the world is broken,” yet you defend every part of that brokenness like it’s sacred. If fairness is gone and the system’s desperate, then why defend it like it’s flawless? “Action = consequence” isn’t a shield for cruelty—it’s just an excuse when you're too numb to recognize injustice anymore.

It's not that you're talking to a wall, you simply refuse to listen, and even acknowledge the disgusting things you said earlier, just because it's a fiction and a manhwa doesn't mean you get to yap bullshit because when shit like that happens in real life, you'd react the same way, or when it happens to you.

You just don't listen, and push the fact that you want to be right when your points are all over, and in fact DEHUMANIZING

You call me dogshit when I'm just mirroring your bullshit attitude that you gave from the very beginning, get a life.

Genuinely hate people like you who thinks that rationality is the answer to everything, just admit that you're heartless, even if this is just manhwa you've shown how much of a shitty person you are, at least when it comes to viewing justicd

Just admit that you're selfish. Imagine reading that whole pannel and thinking "Yeh, he deserves it, who gaf about him and his son anyway? It's not like them dying disturbs the function in the village" right?

Very well explained

Man's defending the same guy in the recent chapters... Bro does not only execute, but murder PPL because he can.