Yeah well it is grooming and thats not better than a rapist. Don’t even try to compare the two because both of them are the worst and nothing changes that. People who read these kinds of manhwas know what they are reading and are willing to neglect their moral compass. Honestly at the end of day it doesn’t matter. It’s genuinely up to you.
Enlighten us how it’s grooming :) because we didn’t see ONE scene indicating Taegu trying to seduce, brainwash MC since his teen years. So explain
Like I genuinely can’t with yall. You put equal sign between things we’ve literally seen in this story, literal actions and some made up sceneries which FOR NOW have absolute no proof in the story
It’s funny how it’s the same person with this ohh this is not grooming blah blah blah plus ur repeating ur words and most of it don’t even make sense lmao.
I’ll break it down for you.
So, according to google grooming is “the action of attempting to form a relationship with a child or young person, with the intention of sexually assaulting them or inducing them to commit an illegal act such as selling drugs or joining a terrorist organization.”
As we know from the story, the ahjussi met the mc when he was in middle school. When he was a child. And no it was not indicated that he wanted to form a sexual relationship with a child,no.
The way the story has been developing, there have been multiple signs that the uncle MIGHT have ulterior motives. The way he is overprotective over the mc and in the recent chapter where he held on to him?? Plus the literal cover of the manhwa has a hand brushing on the mcs face implying it coukd be the uncle since there’s not another third party that's been introduced till now.
Not just that, a lot of people HAVE pointed out what’s wrong and if you don’t agree with that, That’s fine, just don’t force your opinions on others.
If there’s no implications of him being a groomer, then you really can’t say he’s a groomer until it’s actually proved that he is like OK. You don’t have to like the relationship because I sure don’t but calling him a groomer when there’s no proof that he is, it’s just wrong of itself.
It’s clear you haven’t read the entire comment. I said if the story progresses in that direction, it’s grooming. Please don’t jump to the gun before reading the entire thing.
Omfg you still don’t get it. I already said the story MAY go in such direction but FOR NOW there was not even one panel that shows that Taegu had lusted after MC when he was a kid and had ulterior motives and tired to brainwash MC since he was a kid. I can’t with you.
Bravo I know the definition. You clearly on the other hand didn’t so now you add things how he might be a groomer because there is absolute no proof for now in the story.
It’s pointless talking with that person. Bravo you’ve got the point
Yall what are we even comparing here. Seo-in is a serial rapist and sexual offender. It’s a fact. He is criminal. No sob back story is gonna change it.
Taegu didn’t do anything at this point. Beside showing up and getting too invested in MC’s life. Also you clearly have no idea what grooming is. We didn’t see one scene that would indicate grooming. Groomers don’t wait 10 years after someone became legal adult to „seduce them”. I’m not a fan of such dynamic at all but Taegu starting to have feelings, for someone he used to know in the past and helped in some way, once that person turned adult (we didn’t see one scene proving otherwise) is definitely less „creepy and abnormal” than federal offence which is rape. Or maybe thoughts are bigger crime than literal rape now? Thoughtcrime…. Orwell is definitely laughing from his grave.
And I don’t even ship MC with any of them.