OOH People hate this?? DAMN MORE FOR ME!!

And get ur Omniscient Reader's Viewpoint pfp off, nobody accepts a rape kink fujoshi/fudanshi like you in our fandom. You ain't welcome here, go back to other shtty sites that have nothing but hentai about men fucking each other, and ofc, as always your favorite kink, RAPE I'm sure you will find ur community!! Go go go, you rape kink lover!!

Ahh, ofc you have "Raising Beta" in ur "Currently Reading (Good shit)" list LOLLL u rlly do love rapey manhwas huh? Must be falling that sht every night PFFFTT

being so happy with telling someone to get raped is pretty hardcore ngl. don’t worry i support your mental illness, the psych ward needs a new patient after all (〜￣u￣)〜

stalking? oh she a fan WBK (▰˘◡˘▰)

It’s funny how you keep tryna ragebait me but everytime you do i just can’t help but laugh because of how stupid you sound rn. Like lmaooo cry about it ヾ(❀╹◡╹)ﾉ~

I notice we've moved past discussing the 'illegal site' point, which is interesting because that was a key part of this conversation. If we're going to have a productive discussion about tropes in BL, it's important to address all aspects raised - not just the ones that are easier to argue. The platform where content is read doesn't change whether a trope's portrayal is problematic or not, which is why I believe we should focus on that more substantial discussion.

About the tags and warnings point, I agree readers should respect content warnings and avoid stories they know will upset them. But tags alone don't resolve the bigger conversation about how these themes are handled. A 'sexual assault' tag tells us *what* happens, but not how it's portrayed, whether it's romanticized, critically examined, or just used for shock value. That 'how' is what actually deserves discussion.

For example:
- A story might tag rape but handle it with nuance, showing realistic trauma and consequences
- Another might use the same tag but frame it as a love catalyst, which is what many understandably criticize

The tag warns us the topic exists, but readers still have valid reasons to critique its execution. That's not hypocrisy, it's engaging critically with media. If we only ever said 'you clicked on it, no complaints allowed,' we'd never have important conversations about improving representation in the genre.

That said, you're right that some people leave unproductive hate instead of thoughtful criticism. There's definitely a difference between saying 'this trope is harmful because X' versus just ranting after ignoring tags. Maybe the solution is pushing for better discussions, not no discussions at all?

Well pardon me for me limited vocabulary, ms ‘morally upright and correct’. Like other people i am also entitled to my opinion. This my comment box first. You guys found fault with that. And i merely gave you the discussion you desperately wanted from me. You keep mentioning the illegal website but is not what i say true? I was merely using it as a medium/as an example of hypocrisy. You’re the one who took it to heart wrongly in the first place. Because you yourself also know that it is wrong.

Hypocrisy — the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform.

Morals — conforming to a standard of what is right and good. moral implies conformity to established sanctioned codes or accepted notions of right and wrong. the basic moral values of a community.

If you are morally good and is ethically correct then what are you doing at an illegal website? Shouldn’t you be preaching on the official one instead?

To talk and preach about morals when you yourself is committing an unmoral act. Is it not an act of hypocrisy? What is it then?

Again i DID NOT stop any discussions from happening NOR DO I glorify grape. I merely called yall hypocrites. Solely on the FACT that you are reading on an ILLEGAL WEBSITE and is trying to preach about MORALS. When in truth a person WITH actual MORALS would do NO SUCH THING.

Let’s autopsy this trainwreck of an argument:

1 ’I was just pointing out hypocrisy’
→ Cool, except you’re USING the illegal site TOO. So by your own definition, you’re ALSO a hypocrite. Congrats, you played yourself.

2 ’You’re preaching morals!’
→ Quote where I said I was ‘morally good.’ Oh wait—you can’t. Because my argument was *always about WRITING TROPES, not morality. You invented a fake stance to attack because you’ve got nothing else.

3 ‘Why aren’t you on official sites?!’
→ Irrelevant. Whether I read legally or not doesn’t change:
- Rape tropes can still be criticized
- Your logic is still hypocritical
- You’re still dodging the actual discussion

The Real Issue You Keep Avoiding:
No one here claimed moral superiority, YOU did. All I said was:
- Tags don’t make tropes immune to critique
- Your ‘illegal site’ rant was a deflection*
- You’re guilty of the hypocrisy you accused others of

Let’s make this simple, since you keep missing the point:

1. I never ‘preached morals’ you invented that to dodge the actual discussion.
- My comment was about why people criticize rape tropes in fiction, not ‘morality.’
- You’re the one obsessed with ‘illegal sites’ and ‘moral high ground’ projection much?

2. Your ‘hypocrite’ claim backfires on YOU.
- If reading illegally voids opinions, then your rants are just as ‘invalid.’
- You’re using the same site while acting superior, that’s the REAL hypocrisy.

3. Stay on topic:
- The debate was about tropes, not piracy.
- You switched the goalposts because you can’t defend romanticized rape in BL.

You’re yelling about ‘morals’ nobody brought up (except you) to avoid admitting your logic is garbage. Try harder.

Heyy, don't group me with someone who has a rape kink!! I may be cruel to those who deserve it, but cut me slack~ Still manifesting tho!! You'll def get to experience it, trust!! I'm sure you will get off of it!

"stalking" and it's just one click and scrolling PFFFTTT, man this is too hilarious. And yessss, I love how you never gave any counter argument HAHAHAHAHHA just rlly proves ig~ Keep on going!! We both very know you can't give any actual good defense. You must be watching videos from charlie Kirk! He's rlly good with dodging questions, and has sooo many fallacies when it comes to debates.

Keep them coming rape lover!! Keep them cominggg~

And omg, I'm sure you'd also cummed from the rape scenes on this manhwa WAIT HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH

That's disgusting honestly omfggg, nah nah LOLLL

You’re yelling about ‘morals’ nobody brought up (except you) to avoid admitting your logic is garbage.
By that I mean, I(as in ME) didn't brought it up. And you keep talking about morals.

Omgah, noooo waaaayy??? I was ragebaitinggg?? To a rape lover?!?!?! How could I!! Well I meannn, you better come up a better defense. I'm still waiting btw! And HELPP, it's ironic how you call me stupid but your over here getting ur ass dragged, and still have no actual defense PFFFTTT

Let's see if this fandom can accept someone like you!! I mean, I'm sure there's gonna be a bad apple in the fandom, so ig you have those ppl!! Rape lovers uniting aw ;-;

OOOOHHH YOU ATE THEM UPPP HELPPPP

"Again i DID NOT stop any discussions from happening"

That's a big fat lie
You literally said:
"if you hate it just take it up with the author/artist. If not just leave. no need to bring up discussions that obviously only caters to your tastes"

Now you’re claiming you DID NOT stop any discussions?? Pick one.

If you actually supported discussion, you wouldn’t be telling people to just leave instead of engaging. Stay consistent

HAHAHHAAH isn't it hilarious how they aren't even giving actual defense??? I'm telling you, these rape lovers should rlly start experiencing it themselves. Like srsly, I rlly do believe the saying that some ppl r too privilege to ever sympathize with ppl's traumas or even see anything wrong with it. I'm just gonna guess that this person is a veryyyyy young child. How unfortunate that their brain has alrdy rotted :/