i don't really think so because it's not a literal dog who crawls on four legs and literally looks and acts like a dog(the ones irl). I'm not hating but just trying to clarify between a zoo and a furry, sorry if i'm wrong I'm not defending on either sides
Zoophilia is wrong because animals can not consent. Animals do not have mental capacity to. What you're saying suggests that if someone has genitals too close to an animal they have no mental capacity to consent which In this story that just isn't accurate
And that is still a dog's rocket
That's attached to a consenting adult...
Right so if we make a oc that's a dog but has consent, it's not zoo. got it goober
there’s a big difference between liking a hot werewolf man and liking him because he has a dog dih
If they have the same mental capacity as a consenting adult, yes and no..generally in the real world zoophilia is defined as an attraction to animals. which yes it technically would be, but the difference is animals in the real world can't consent, fictional ones with the same mental capacity as a human can.
Even so, definitely a weird oc, but this story doesn't have that. Dude is basically a werewolf, not the feral kind either. He can consent. You see romance novels all over the world involving werewolves and you don't see people claiming its Zoophillia. I mean, hey, believe what you want. If you feel strongly about that, only words won't change how you feel.
People aren’t reading this just for the red rocket. They’re reading it for the werewolf who happens to have a dog dick. Let’s not imply that people that enjoy werewolf porn or monster porn internal are going to find a literal ass dog attractive. If this is zoo, I guess all kids that found Simba attractive must be zoos too. You’re reasoning is mad dumb
y'all cannot come to the fact that this is just zoo at this rate cuz dawg those r dog parts